10.04.2016 Views

Biblical Hermeneutics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRINCIPLES OF BIBLICAL HERMENETICS ; M. M. NINAN<br />

Of the 6 words with Aleph in them in the verse: in the first 2 Aleph is positioned as third<br />

letter (concealed God in the first 2000 years), in the next 2 Aleph is positioned as first letter<br />

(revealed God in the middle 2000 years), in the last 2 Aleph is positioned as second letter<br />

(balance between concealed and revealed God in the last 2000 tears).<br />

This is a Remez-allusion exegesis, but gains further meaning in Kabbalah Jewish mysticism<br />

(Sod-Secret exegesis) by the Kabbalistic doctrine that Creation was ennacted through the<br />

Hebrew letters of the Torah.<br />

One example of a remez is found in the Akkedah, the account of Isaac’s “sacrifice” by his<br />

father Abraham. As we mentioned before, the p’shat meaning is that God was testing<br />

Abraham’s faith. However, there is also a hint of something else in the narrative: “Abraham<br />

called the name of that place The LORD Will Provide, as it is said to this day, "In the mount of<br />

the LORD it will be provided” (Gen. 22:14). Note both the prophetic name and the<br />

expectation in the time of Moses (who wrote down the account) that this prophetic name<br />

would come to pass in that same place. And indeed, ADONAI did provide on that very same<br />

mountain a Son for a sacrifice in place of Isaac, and in place of all of us. This “hint” of a<br />

prophetic name is our clue pointing beyond the simple test of Abraham’s faith to the Messiah.<br />

DERASH (MIDRASH)<br />

The third method Derash means search. This is the allegorical, typological or homiletical<br />

application of the text. Three important rules in utilizing the drash level of understanding a<br />

scripture are:<br />

• A drash understanding can not be used to strip a passage of its PASHAT meaning, nor<br />

may any such understanding contradict any direct Pashat meaning of any other<br />

scripture passage. It is the simple direct meaning that is the first choice interpretation<br />

• Scripture interprets scripture. Allegories are basically cultural. Hence we should be<br />

looking for other similar scriptures to deine the allegory. For example use Mt. 12:18-<br />

23 to understand Mt. 13:3-9; Rev. 1:20 to understand Rev. 1:12-16; Rev. 17:7-18 to<br />

understand Rev. 17:2-8 etc. Be careful to consider the culture, historical period and<br />

context since symbols change with time even within a culture.<br />

• The primary components of an allegory represent specific realities. We should limit<br />

ourselves to these primary components when understanding the text.<br />

Examples of taking advantage of scripture comparison of with scripture :<br />

Mt. 2:15 on Hosea 11:1<br />

Mt. 3:11 on Is. 40:3<br />

Rom. 5:14 (14-21) on Gen. 3:1-24<br />

Gal. 4:24(21-31) on Gen. 17-22<br />

(gemara makkos 23b) An interesting extreme case is seen in how Rabbi Simlai deduced that<br />

there were 613 mitzvot taught to Moses at Mount Sinai.<br />

The verse says that (Deut 33,4) Torah was given to us through Moses at Sinai. The gematria<br />

of Torah is 611. And one should add to them the first two of the Ten Commandments that<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!