01.04.2016 Views

551[1]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recent Books 121<br />

Reflecting the wide reach of James’s work, this twelve-essay volume includes<br />

a variety of approaches to James from authors with diverse disciplinary<br />

backgrounds. It is divided into two parts, the first of which treats James’s<br />

intellectual contexts and the second of which is dedicated to the<br />

philosophy of pluralism.<br />

Both parts are likely to interest readers of The Way, albeit for different<br />

reasons. Although all twelve chapters offer reflections on the ways James<br />

engaged (personally and philosophically) with European intellectuals<br />

during the Victorian and Edwardian periods, the first part of the book is<br />

more historical in character, with chapters on the reception of James’s<br />

work in Europe, his relationship to ecumenical Protestantism, and ‘the<br />

woman question’. Several of these chapters offer family portraits of the<br />

Jameses—a transatlantic family with a dominant and tormented paternal<br />

figure in Henry James, Sr, and two offspring of genius in William and<br />

Henry Jr (the novelist who wrote Portrait of a Lady and The Bostonians,<br />

among other works). Henry Sr is portrayed as a ‘theological eccentric’<br />

(p.81), whose focus on death cast lasting shadows over his children’s lives.<br />

The second part, on the philosophy of pluralism, gives more focus to<br />

James’s ideas themselves, and their applicability to debates today, than to<br />

setting them in biographical or historical context. As someone who teaches<br />

James’s The Varieties of Religious Experience to undergraduates, this part was<br />

especially interesting and useful to me for, as the editors state in the<br />

introduction, James ‘did not just speak to the late nineteenth century’ (p.11).<br />

That his insights are still worthy of study is attested by the range and<br />

quality of approaches taken in this latter part. David C. Lamberth’s chapter<br />

‘A Pluralistic Universe a Century Later: Rationalism, Pluralism, and<br />

Religion’ discusses James’s objections to ‘vicious intellectualism’—a<br />

‘philosophic sin’, as Lamberth calls it, that preferred concepts (as products<br />

of the intellect) to percepts (products of sensation or experience).<br />

Thinking of this kind prioritises ‘knowledge about’ over ‘direct<br />

acquaintance’. For James, as Lamberth writes,<br />

Thinking is not generally best understood along the traditional lines of<br />

contemplation or theoria. Rather, thinking is a form of adaptive behaviour<br />

oriented most basically to action in and on a relatively stable but also<br />

continuously evolving environment. (p.135)<br />

The implications of James’ rejection of ‘vicious intellectualism’ for the<br />

philosophy of religion—especially for current debates about atheism and<br />

theism—are developed in Sami Pihlström’s excellent essay ‘Jamesian<br />

Pragmatic Pluralism and the Problem of God’. Pihlström argues that ‘we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!