DPCA 1-2 full issue

29.03.2016 Views

Call for papers Would you like to write an article for Diabetes & Primary Care Australia? The new journal from the Primary Care Diabetes Society of Australia To submit an article or if you have any queries, please contact: gary.kilov@pcdsa.com.au. Title page Please include the article title, the full names of the authors and their institutional affiliations, as well as full details of each author’s current appointment. This page should also have the name, address and contact telephone number(s) of the corresponding author. Article points and key words Four or five sentences of 15–20 words that summarise the major themes of the article. Please also provide four or five key words that highlight the content of the article. Abstract Approximately 150 words briefly introducing your article, outlining the discussion points and main conclusions. Introduction In 60–120 words, this should aim to draw the reader into the article as well as broadly stating what the article is about. Main body Use sub-headings liberally and apply formatting to differentiate between heading levels (you may have up to three heading levels). The article must have a conclusion, which should be succinct and logically ordered, ideally identifying gaps in present knowledge and implications for practice, as well as suggesting future initiatives. Tables and illustrations Tables and figures – particularly photographs – are encouraged wherever appropriate. Figures and tables should be numbered consecutively in the order of their first citation in the text. Present tables at the end of the articles; supply figures as logically labelled separate files. If a figure or table has been published previously, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce the material. References In the text Use the name and year (Harvard) system for references in the text, as exemplified by the following: ● As Smith and Jones (2013) have shown … ● As already reported (Smith and Jones, 2013) … For three or more authors, give the first author’s surname followed by et al: ● As Robson et al (2015) have shown … Simultaneous references should be ordered chronologically first, and then alphabetically: ● (Smith and Jones, 2013; Young, 2013; Black, 2014). Statements based on a personal communication should be indicated as such, with the name of the person and the year. In the reference list The total number of references should not exceed 30 without prior discussion with the Editor. Arrange references alphabetically first, and then chronologically. Give the surnames and initials of all authors for references with four or fewer authors; for five or more, give the first three and add “et al”. Papers accepted but not yet published may be included in the reference list as being “[In press]”. Journal article example: Robson R, Seed J, Khan E et al (2015) Diabetes in childhood. Diabetes Journal 9: 119–23 Whole book example: White F, Moore B (2014) Childhood Diabetes. Academic Press, Melbourne Book chapter example: Fisher M (2012) The role of age. In: Merson A, Kriek U (eds). Diabetes in Children. 2nd edn. Academic Press, Melbourne: 15–32 Document on website example: Department of Health (2009) Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool (AUSDRISK). Australian Government, Canberra. Available at: http://www. health.gov.au/preventionoftype2diabetes (accessed 22.07.15) Article types Articles may fall into the categories below. All articles should be 1700–2300 words in length and written with consideration of the journal’s readership (general practitioners, practice nurses, prescribing advisers and other healthcare professionals with an interest in primary care diabetes). Clinical reviews should present a balanced consideration of a particular clinical area, covering the evidence that exists. The relevance to practice should be highlighted where appropriate. Original research articles should be presented with sections for the background, aims, methods, results, discussion and conclusion. The discussion should consider the implications for practice. Clinical guideline articles should appraise newly published clinical guidelines and assess how they will sit alongside existing guidelines and impact on the management of diabetes. Organisational articles could provide information on newly published organisational guidelines or explain how a particular local service has been organised to benefit people with diabetes. — Diabetes & Primary Care Australia —

From the desktop From the desktop Individualising clients in dietary management Erin Jackson have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, “You and the only way, it does not exist.” Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche wrote this in the late 19 th Century, articulating the diversity among individuals; however, it took me a while to fully realise what he meant. As a freshly graduated dietitian with a brain full of nutrition facts and a head size to match, it became clear there was something amiss when I began working in the clinic. The outcomes that the literature promised were few and far between, and the client return statistics were dismal. But how? I was following the guidelines; all the client needed to do was comply with these very precise dietary principles every day for the rest of their life. Luckily, after a little more practice in the game and with some hard-to-take reflection, it became clear that no two clients required the same diet even when they had the same condition. The importance of what they were eating and the reasons why was more of an influence than the dietary advice I was giving. Take your diet yesterday, for example. What influenced the foods you ate? Was it taste, time, convenience, cost, environment, availability, culture or tradition? Despite both of us knowing it is not the healthiest option, the reason why you had toast and jam for breakfast might be very different from the reason why I had had toast and jam, and if these reasons are different then the solutions to change are also likely to differ. So returning to Nietzsche, once I had come to terms with “the only way does not exist” and had individualised the dietary approach to my clients, the outcomes we were after finally followed. We developed suitable options that clients were able to contemplate slotting into their daily lives because, in the end, it is the client who decides whether or not to implement the advice. We’ve found that if advice is impractical or too dissimilar to what they are used to doing, then the sustainability of any change will be compromised. Implementing the individual-based approach becomes even more pertinent when considering the presenting condition of the clients. For example, as we all know in diabetes, one client may have very good glycaemic control whilst another may not. Therefore despite both of these clients having diabetes, the approach to their dietary management will differ significantly. This is perhaps why, when we were approached to trial lowering carbohydrate intake as a means of improving glycaemic control in some clients, I was open to the idea. As a result, my practice incurred the biggest and most inspiring change yet. Once an advocate for encouraging carbohydrate intake in diabetes management (as long as it was low glycaemic index!), I was now lowering carbohydrate altogether and seeing significantly better client outcomes across all key parameters including weight, glycaemic control and even lipids. Again, the amount of restriction was individualised to the client based on what they could sustain and their glycaemic profile. Surprisingly, clients were finding the change much more achievable and sustainable than previous dietary advice and were inevitably eating a much healthier, unprocessed and well-rounded diet. As a dietitian, I am so fortunate to have the time to sit with a client and determine and understand the details of why they eat what they eat. When they return to the clinic (and yes, they do now return!), they know that if a strategy hasn’t worked, we will find an alternative. They won’t be chastised or made to feel uncomfortable; they will be supported and encouraged, because the right way, the correct way and the only way – it does not exist. n Citation: Jackson E (2016) Individualising clients in dietary management. Diabetes & Primary Care Australia 1: 51 About this series The aim of the “From the desktop” series is to provide practical expert opinion and comment from the clinic. In this issue, Erin Jackson champions individualised care after seeing the results for herself in clinic. Author Erin Jackson is an Accredited Practising Dietitian and Accredited Nutritionist, Member of the Dietitians Association of Australia, and Lecturer at the University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Tas. Diabetes & Primary Care Australia Vol 1 No 2 2016 51

Call for papers<br />

Would you like to write an article<br />

for Diabetes & Primary Care Australia?<br />

The new journal from the Primary Care Diabetes Society of Australia<br />

To submit an article or if you have any queries, please contact: gary.kilov@pcdsa.com.au.<br />

Title page<br />

Please include the article title, the <strong>full</strong> names of the authors<br />

and their institutional affiliations, as well as <strong>full</strong> details of<br />

each author’s current appointment. This page should also have<br />

the name, address and contact telephone number(s) of the<br />

corresponding author.<br />

Article points and key words<br />

Four or five sentences of 15–20 words that summarise the major<br />

themes of the article. Please also provide four or five key words<br />

that highlight the content of the article.<br />

Abstract<br />

Approximately 150 words briefly introducing your article,<br />

outlining the discussion points and main conclusions.<br />

Introduction<br />

In 60–120 words, this should aim to draw the reader into the<br />

article as well as broadly stating what the article is about.<br />

Main body<br />

Use sub-headings liberally and apply formatting to differentiate<br />

between heading levels (you may have up to three heading levels).<br />

The article must have a conclusion, which should be succinct and<br />

logically ordered, ideally identifying gaps in present knowledge and<br />

implications for practice, as well as suggesting future initiatives.<br />

Tables and illustrations<br />

Tables and figures – particularly photographs – are encouraged<br />

wherever appropriate. Figures and tables should be numbered<br />

consecutively in the order of their first citation in the text. Present<br />

tables at the end of the articles; supply figures as logically labelled<br />

separate files. If a figure or table has been published previously,<br />

acknowledge the original source and submit written permission<br />

from the copyright holder to reproduce the material.<br />

References<br />

In the text<br />

Use the name and year (Harvard) system for references in the<br />

text, as exemplified by the following:<br />

● As Smith and Jones (2013) have shown …<br />

● As already reported (Smith and Jones, 2013) …<br />

For three or more authors, give the first author’s surname<br />

followed by et al:<br />

● As Robson et al (2015) have shown …<br />

Simultaneous references should be ordered chronologically first,<br />

and then alphabetically:<br />

● (Smith and Jones, 2013; Young, 2013; Black, 2014).<br />

Statements based on a personal communication should be<br />

indicated as such, with the name of the person and the year.<br />

In the reference list<br />

The total number of references should not exceed 30 without prior<br />

discussion with the Editor. Arrange references alphabetically first,<br />

and then chronologically. Give the surnames and initials of all<br />

authors for references with four or fewer authors; for five or more,<br />

give the first three and add “et al”. Papers accepted but not yet<br />

published may be included in the reference list as being “[In press]”.<br />

Journal article example: Robson R, Seed J, Khan E et al (2015)<br />

Diabetes in childhood. Diabetes Journal 9: 119–23<br />

Whole book example: White F, Moore B (2014) Childhood<br />

Diabetes. Academic Press, Melbourne<br />

Book chapter example: Fisher M (2012) The role of age. In: Merson<br />

A, Kriek U (eds). Diabetes in Children. 2nd edn. Academic Press,<br />

Melbourne: 15–32<br />

Document on website example: Department of Health (2009)<br />

Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool (AUSDRISK).<br />

Australian Government, Canberra. Available at: http://www.<br />

health.gov.au/preventionoftype2diabetes (accessed 22.07.15)<br />

Article types<br />

Articles may fall into the categories below. All articles should be<br />

1700–2300 words in length and written with consideration of<br />

the journal’s readership (general practitioners, practice nurses,<br />

prescribing advisers and other healthcare professionals with an<br />

interest in primary care diabetes).<br />

Clinical reviews should present a balanced consideration of a<br />

particular clinical area, covering the evidence that exists. The<br />

relevance to practice should be highlighted where appropriate.<br />

Original research articles should be presented with sections<br />

for the background, aims, methods, results, discussion and<br />

conclusion. The discussion should consider the implications<br />

for practice.<br />

Clinical guideline articles should appraise newly published<br />

clinical guidelines and assess how they will sit alongside<br />

existing guidelines and impact on the management of diabetes.<br />

Organisational articles could provide information on newly<br />

published organisational guidelines or explain how a particular<br />

local service has been organised to benefit people with diabetes.<br />

— Diabetes & Primary Care Australia —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!