Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century
2739-giftedness-and-talent-in-the-21st-century
2739-giftedness-and-talent-in-the-21st-century
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D. AMBROSE<br />
CATCH A WAVE: A METAPHORICAL LANDSCAPE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTAL<br />
TRAJECTORIES OF CIVILIZATIONS, EDUCATION SYSTEMS, AND CREATIVELY<br />
INTELLIGENT INDIVIDUALS<br />
The “catch a wave” model, which takes different forms <strong>in</strong> Figures 1 <strong>and</strong> 2, provides<br />
a metaphorical l<strong>and</strong>scape illustrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance of reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g education –<br />
especially gifted education – <strong>in</strong> rapidly evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> challeng<strong>in</strong>g <strong>21st</strong>-century<br />
socioeconomic, political, <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts. The two versions of <strong>the</strong> wave model<br />
represent two different levels of analysis – <strong>the</strong> societal level shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
level of <strong>the</strong> education system shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The models provide frameworks for<br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g large-scale contextual threats <strong>and</strong> opportunities, which are revealed<br />
by scholarship <strong>in</strong> a variety of discipl<strong>in</strong>es. The structure <strong>and</strong> dynamics of each model<br />
portray <strong>the</strong> profound changes that have been tak<strong>in</strong>g place s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> mid-20th century.<br />
Implications for gifted education, general education, <strong>and</strong> creative studies can be<br />
derived from <strong>the</strong> models because <strong>the</strong> knowledge, skills, <strong>and</strong> dispositions required<br />
decades ago no longer are sufficient for success <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> century.<br />
Societal Context: Will Our Civilization Thrive or Collapse?<br />
Figure 1 shows <strong>the</strong> societal level of analysis, portray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> success or failure of<br />
<strong>the</strong> globalized, Westernized, market-driven socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> cultural system that<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ates most of <strong>the</strong> world <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> century. The depth dimension on <strong>the</strong> left side<br />
of <strong>the</strong> model signifies <strong>the</strong> passage of time from <strong>the</strong> early to mid-20th century on <strong>in</strong>to<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> century. The top surface of <strong>the</strong> model, mov<strong>in</strong>g from left to right, signifies<br />
a metaphorical l<strong>and</strong>scape along which a society or civilization can advance through<br />
more or less effective economic, sociopolitical, <strong>and</strong> cultural policies <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />
The vertical dimension represents <strong>the</strong> achievement of societal success, conceived of<br />
here as <strong>the</strong> ability of a society to rema<strong>in</strong> viable over <strong>the</strong> long term while lift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
vast majority of its citizens toward ethically guided self-fulfillment.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> surface at <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong> model a straight arrow mov<strong>in</strong>g from left to right<br />
represents <strong>the</strong> trajectory of Western society <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early-mid 20th century. Despite<br />
a few <strong>in</strong>termittent stall outs (e.g., <strong>the</strong> Great Depression, WW II), our civilization<br />
at that time moved forward predictably on a l<strong>in</strong>ear path toward success; however,<br />
that success was somewhat limited, signified by moderate elevation as <strong>the</strong> culture<br />
progressed toward <strong>the</strong> right-rear sector of <strong>the</strong> model. In a century dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />
modernist ideology throughout most of <strong>the</strong> developed world (see Inglehart, 1997)<br />
success as a society primarily meant enabl<strong>in</strong>g entrepreneurial capitalists to build<br />
a level of prosperity (broadly shared <strong>in</strong> some nations, not <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs) based on <strong>the</strong><br />
extraction <strong>and</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ement of natural resources. While resource shortages <strong>and</strong><br />
environmental problems were emerg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> that era <strong>the</strong>y did not dom<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>and</strong><br />
societal collapse was on <strong>the</strong> seem<strong>in</strong>gly distant horizon. The noticeable but somewhat<br />
limited level of success <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> back, right-h<strong>and</strong> sector of <strong>the</strong> model represents <strong>the</strong><br />
way <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant conceptions of societal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual fulfillment were<br />
16