25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Biblical and Secular <strong>Chronology</strong> 83<br />

numbering of Olympiads was introduced by Timaeus or by<br />

Eratosthenes” 16 And Dr. Alan E. Samuel specifies: “<strong>The</strong> Olympiad<br />

reckoning system, originated by Philistus, was subsequently used in<br />

an historical context by Timaeus, and from then on we find<br />

historical chronologies based on Olympiads.” 17 Timaeus Sicilus<br />

wrote a history of Sicily, his native country, in 264 B.C.E., and<br />

Eratosthenes, a librarian at the famous library in Alexandria in<br />

Egypt, published his Chronographiae some decades later.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Olympiad reckoning, then, like the <strong>Christ</strong>ian era, was<br />

introduced more than 500 years after the year that was chosen as the<br />

starting-point for that era! How did the Greek historians manage to<br />

fix the date for the first Olympiad as well as other dates (for<br />

example, the first year of Cyrus) hundreds of years later? What kind<br />

of sources were at their disposal?<br />

<strong>The</strong>y studied lists of victors in the quadrennial games kept at<br />

Olympia. But unfortunately such lists had not been kept<br />

continuously all the way from the beginning. As Dr. Samuel points<br />

out, the first list was “drawn up by Hippias at the end of the fifth<br />

century B.C.,” that is, around 400 B.C.E. 18 “By Hellenistic times<br />

the list of victors was complete and reasonably consistent and the<br />

framework for chronology was established and accepted.” 19 But<br />

was the list reliable? Samuel continues: “Whether all this was right,<br />

or whether events were assigned to years correctly, is another<br />

matter.” Pointing out that “the shrewd Plutarch [c. 46–c. 120 C.E.]<br />

had his doubts,” he goes on to caution that “we too should be very<br />

dubious about chronographic evidence from Olympiads much<br />

before the middle or beginning of the fifth century [i.e., before 450<br />

or 500 B.C.E.]” 20<br />

<strong>The</strong> Watch Tower Society’s confidence in the Olympiad<br />

reckoning is even more illusory, however. This is because, while<br />

they accept the Olympiad dates given by ancient historians for the<br />

reign of Cyrus, they reject the Olympiad dates given by these<br />

historians for the reign of Artaxerxes I, despite the fact his reign<br />

fell much closer to our time. Thus, when Julius Africanus, in his<br />

Chronography (published c. 221/22 C.E.), dates the 20th year of<br />

16 Elias J. Bickerman, <strong>Chronology</strong> of the Ancient World, revised edition (London:<br />

Thames and Hudson, 1980), p. 75.<br />

17 Alan E. Samuel, Greek and Roman <strong>Chronology</strong> (München: C. H. Beck’sche<br />

Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1972), p. 189.<br />

18 A. E. Samuel, op. cit., p. 189.<br />

19 1bid., p. 190.<br />

20 Ibid., p. 190. Bickerman (op. cit., p. 75) agrees: “<strong>The</strong> trustworthiness of the earlier<br />

part of the list of Olympic victors, which begins in 776 BC, is doubtful.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!