25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> History of an Interpretation 67<br />

<strong>The</strong> generally expected Great War finally came in 1914. But<br />

probably none, and in any case not Charles Taze Russell and his<br />

followers, had predicted that it would come that year. <strong>The</strong> very<br />

different events that he and his associated “Bible Students” had<br />

attached to that date did not occur. Like the predictions of the<br />

many other contemporary millennarian writers, their predictions,<br />

too, were proved “definitely, completely, absolutely, false by the<br />

events.”<br />

To claim afterwards, as the Watch Tower Society repeatedly did<br />

up to 1993, that they and they alone “accurately,” “by God’s holy<br />

spirit,” had predicted the outbreak of the war in 1914 and other<br />

events, and that “all the politicians, religious leaders, and economic<br />

experts” had been “telling the people the opposite,” is<br />

demonstrably an outright lie.<br />

As explained earlier, some of those pretentious claims were<br />

finally, in 1993, withdrawn in the new book Jehovah’s Witnesses—<br />

Proclaimers of God’s Kingdom. <strong>The</strong> book was introduced at the district<br />

assemblies of Jehovah’s Witnesses that year as a “candid look” at<br />

the history of the movement. <strong>The</strong> admissions, however, usually are<br />

contextually surrounded by a minimum of background information<br />

which, moreover, is so apologetically slanted and warped that it<br />

often conceals more than it reveals.<br />

True, the Society finally admits that Russell took over his<br />

calculation of the <strong>Gentile</strong> times from Nelson H. Barbour, who had<br />

published it one year before Russell “in the August, September,<br />

and October 1875 issues of the Herald of the Morning.” 96 In the<br />

preceding paragraph the book even seeks to enlist the 19th-century<br />

expositors of the 2,520-year calculation as supporting the 1914<br />

date. This impression is further enhanced by the bold-typed<br />

statement to the left of the paragraph: “<strong>The</strong>y could see that 1914<br />

was clearly marked by Bible prophecy.” <strong>The</strong> presentation of the<br />

history, however, is narrowly limited to a few carefully selected<br />

expositors, the calculations of whom are partially obscured,<br />

adjusted and arranged so as to create the impression that the 2,520-<br />

year calculation uniquely pointed forward to 1914. None of the many other<br />

terminal dates arrived at by expositors before Russell are mentioned. Thus,<br />

although John A. Brown is stated to have arrived at the 2,520 years<br />

“as early as 1823,” his particular application of the period is<br />

completely veiled and distorted in the subsequent sentences:<br />

96 Jehovah’s Witnesses—Proclaimers of God’s Kingdom (Brooklyn, New York: Watchtower<br />

Bible & Tract Society, 1993), p. 134.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!