25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1914 date would most probably have drowned in the sea of<br />

other failed dates and been forgotten by now had it not happened<br />

to be the year of the outbreak of the First World War.<br />

When, back in 1844, E. B. Elliott suggested 1914 as a possible<br />

terminal date for the <strong>Gentile</strong> times, he reckoned the 2,520 years<br />

from Nebuchadnezzar’s accession-year, which he dated to 606 B.C.E.<br />

N. H. Barbour, however, reckoned the 2,520 years from the<br />

desolation of Jerusalem in Nebuchadnezzar’s 18th regnal year. But<br />

as he dated this event to 606 B.C.E., he, too, in 1875, arrived at<br />

1914 as the terminal date. Since their chronologies not only<br />

conflicted with each other, but also conflicted with the historically<br />

established chronology for Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, their arriving<br />

at the same terminal year was simply a coincidence, demonstrating<br />

how arbitrary and gratuitous their calculations really were.<br />

Barbour’s calculation was accepted by C. T. Russell at their<br />

meeting in 1876. Barbour was then fifty-two years old while Russell<br />

was twenty-four— still very young. Although their ways parted<br />

again in the spring of 1879, Russell stuck to Barbour’s time<br />

calculations, and since that time the 1914 date has been the pivotal<br />

point in prophetic explanations among Russell’s followers.<br />

Supplement to the third and later editions, chapter 1:<br />

<strong>The</strong> information presented in this chapter has been available to<br />

the Jehovah’s Witnesses since 1983, when the first edition of this<br />

book was published. In addition, the same information was<br />

summarized by Raymond Franz in chapter 7 of his widely known<br />

work, Crisis of Conscience, published in the same year. Thus—after 10<br />

years—in 1993 the Watch Tower Society finally felt compelled to<br />

admit that neither the 2,520-year calculation nor the 1914 date<br />

originated with Charles Taze Russell as it had held until then.<br />

Further, the Society now also admits that the predictions Russell<br />

and his associates attached to 1914 failed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se admissions are found on pages 134–137 of Jehovah’s<br />

Witnesses—Proclaimers of God’s Kingdom, a book on the history of the<br />

movement published by the Watch Tower Society in 1993. Prior to<br />

1993 the impression given had been that Russell was the first to<br />

publish the 2,520-year calculation pointing to 1914, doing this for<br />

the first time in the October, 1876 issue of George Storrs’<br />

magazine the Bible Examiner. Also, that decades in advance Russell<br />

and his followers foretold the outbreak of World War I in 1914 and<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!