25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furuli’s Second Book 545<br />

Babylonian period is, of course, pure guesswork and a game that no scholar who wants to<br />

be taken seriously would run the risk of becoming involved in. <strong>The</strong> name, written in<br />

Hebrew characters, is either Assyrian or Babylonian, and if the inscription found at Mizpah<br />

dates from the 6 th century BCE, he (or his son) may perhaps have been one of the<br />

Babylonian officials known to have been stationed there after the destruction of Jerusalem.<br />

(J. Zorn, op. cit., pp. 38, 66)<br />

Ayadara<br />

<strong>The</strong> name of the second individual was found on a fragment of a slender bronze circlet with<br />

an incised cuneiform inscription that originally consisted of 30-35 characters, of which only<br />

11 are preserved. <strong>The</strong> inscription was not discovered until 1942 in Berkeley, when some<br />

supposedly unimportant metal fragments were cleaned in a hot bath with caustic soda and<br />

zinc. Jeffrey Zorn states:<br />

“Since only a small part of the inscription survives, its translation is<br />

problematic. It may have read ‘… Ayadara, king of the world, for (the<br />

preservation of) his life and …’ This is clearly a dedicatory inscription of<br />

sorts, but the words indicating what is being dedicated, and to whom, have<br />

been lost. Even the identification of Ayadara is unknown; no one with his<br />

name bearing the title ‘king of the world’ is known from any period. What is<br />

remarkable is that such a dedicatory inscription should turn up on a small tell<br />

in ancient Judah.” – Zorn, op. cit., p. 66.<br />

A photo of the inscription, held at the Badè Museum of Biblical Archaeology in Berkeley,<br />

California<br />

Referring to the two inscriptions, Furuli believes he has found two more “unknown kings”<br />

here who may have been ruling during the Neo-Babylonian period. He says:<br />

“Babylonian kings by the names Mar-šarri-uşur and Ayadara are unknown in<br />

the period covered by Ptolemy’s canon, but the discovery of these names<br />

suggests that two kings with these names reigned in Babylon.” (Furuli, p. 80)<br />

<strong>The</strong> discovery of the two names suggests nothing of the kind.<br />

To find out if the name “Ayadara” really is totally unknown to scholars, a correspondent of<br />

mine wrote to several Assyriologists and asked them if they knew anything about this king.<br />

One of them, Dr. Stephanie Dalley at the Oriental Institute in Oxford, England, who turned<br />

out to be working on texts from the Sealand dynasties, answered in an email dated 10<br />

October 2007:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> king is Aya-dara, abbreviation for Aya-dara-galam-ma, of the First<br />

Sealand dynasty [dated to the mid-second millennium BCE]. I am editing a<br />

very large archive of that king plus a few texts of his predecessor. <strong>The</strong><br />

abbreviated form of the name is known from King-list A.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!