25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

530 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

added to the herd at the next annual counting about a month or two later. <strong>The</strong> “Grand<br />

total” in the 1 st year of Amēl-Marduk, 566 animals, therefore, was increased by this added<br />

group of 104 animals and reduced by the 5 animals paid for the shearing of the flock. This<br />

increased the “Grand total” at the same occasion of counting to 665 animals as shown in<br />

the next line (line 28 on the tablet).<br />

This simple and natural explanation eliminates Furuli’s far-fetched and untenable<br />

explanations about “unknown kings” in this period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> readings of the regnal year numbers<br />

As is shown by the drawings of Sack and van Driel/Nemet-Nejat, some of the year<br />

numbers on the tablet are not easily identified and have been read differently by these<br />

scholars. This is true of the year numbers in lines 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, and 28. <strong>The</strong>refore I<br />

wrote to the Yale University and asked if someone there could collate the year numbers<br />

afresh. This was done by Elizabeth Payne who, in addition to her observations, also<br />

attached a photo of the right half of the tablet. <strong>The</strong> results of her collations of the six lines<br />

mentioned above are shown in the fifth column in the table below. She finds that, “In each<br />

instance, the copy of van Driel/Nemet-Nejat is more reliable” than that of Sack. – Email<br />

Payne-Jonsson, dated October 29, 2008.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most reliable readings of the year numbers on the tablet are shown in column 6 of<br />

Table 2. <strong>The</strong> numbers shown for those read differently by Sack, van Driel/Nemet-Nejat,<br />

Zawadaki, and Furuli (those in lines 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, and 28) are based on Elisabeth<br />

Payne’s collations of the original tablet. <strong>The</strong> reasons for the selected readings of those lines<br />

are given below.<br />

Table 2: <strong>The</strong> readings of the year numbers on NBC 4897<br />

Line + king<br />

mentioned<br />

R.<br />

Sack<br />

Van<br />

Driel/Nemet-<br />

Nejat<br />

Rolf<br />

Furuli<br />

E. Payne’s<br />

corrections<br />

<strong>The</strong> best<br />

readings<br />

2 [Nbk] 1 37 37 30-7(?) 37 2<br />

5 37 37 37 37 2<br />

8 38 38 38 38<br />

11 29 38 ‘over erasure’ 29 38 38 (?)<br />

14 40 41 40 40 or 41 40 (?)<br />

17 31 41 42 41 41<br />

20 32 42 42 42 42<br />

23 -- 43 No year [4]3 43<br />

26 AmM 1 1 1 1<br />

27 AmM 0 0 0,<br />

Another<br />

0<br />

king?<br />

28 2 1 2 1! 1<br />

31 2 2 2 2<br />

34 Ngl 1 1 1 1<br />

37 Nbk–Ngl: 37 – 1 37 – 1 37 – 1 37 – 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!