25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furuli’s Second Book 503<br />

Another possibility is that Venus and Saturn were confused. Venus, in fact, was 8 o “in front<br />

of” (= west of) α Virginis at this time.<br />

FURULI: YEAR 7 = 640 BCE:<br />

Line 13: Year 7 in Furuli’s revised chronology is 640 BCE. <strong>The</strong> last visibility of Saturn in<br />

640 occurred in the evening of September 10, and the previous first lunar visibility in the<br />

evening of September 3 according to the program. This would make the distance from the<br />

1 st of the lunar month 6 (September 3) to the last visibility of Saturn (September 10) only 7<br />

days.<br />

This conflicts with the tablet, which shows that more than 10 days (“10+[x]”) separated the<br />

two events.<br />

Line 14: <strong>The</strong> program shows that in 640 BCE the first visibility of Saturn occurred in the<br />

morning of October 12 (Walker, October 10). <strong>The</strong> previous first lunar visibility took place<br />

in the evening of October 3. If that was the beginning of day 1 in the lunar calendar, “day<br />

15” of month 7 would have begun in the evening of October 17, with the first visibility of<br />

Saturn occurring in the next morning on October 18. But this was 6 days after the date<br />

given by the program (October 12) and 8 days after Walker’s date (October 10). This<br />

deviation excludes year 640 as the 7 th year of Kandalanu.<br />

<strong>The</strong> position of Saturn is given on the tablet as “´in front of´ the Furrow α+ ( Virginis)”,<br />

which also seems to conflict with Furuli’s alternative chronology. Its position on October 12<br />

and 10 (and still on October 18) in 640 was about 12 o behind α Virginis, not in front of,<br />

above, or below the star. But as the signs are somewhat damaged here, this position is not<br />

decisive.<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION<br />

Above the entries for the first seven years of Kandalanu have been examined. This is half of<br />

the entries on the tablet which covers 14 years in all. It is not necessary to tire out the reader<br />

with a detailed discussion of the remaining entries. <strong>The</strong> results for the whole period are<br />

presented in the two tables below. <strong>The</strong> tables show the results only for the entries with fully<br />

preserved dates (15 out of the 28 lines). <strong>The</strong> first table shows how these records tally with<br />

the traditional chronology, and the second table shows how they tally with Furuli’s revised<br />

dates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!