25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

496 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

As the Saturn Tablet definitely blocks any change of this kind, it has to be reinterpreted in<br />

some way. Furuli has realized that he cannot simply wave it away as unreliable, as he does<br />

with so many other uncomfortable astronomical tablets.<br />

To overcome this problem Furuli tries to argue that Nabopolassar and Kandalanu is one<br />

and the same person. (Furuli, chapter 12, pp. 193-209) This idea will be discussed in some<br />

detail at the end of this article, but one of the problems with it is that the first year of<br />

Kandalanu is fixed to 647 BCE, not to 645 as is required by Furuli’s variant of the<br />

Watchtower chronology (the “Oslo <strong>Chronology</strong>”). To “solve” this problem, Furuli argues<br />

that there may have been not one but two years of interregnum before the reign of<br />

Nabopolassar. He also speculates that “a scribe could have reckoned his first regnal year one<br />

or two years before it actually started”! (Furuli, p. 340) He ends up lowering the first year of<br />

Nabopolassar/Kandalanu one year, from 647 to 646, claiming that the observations on the<br />

Saturn Tablet may be applied to this lowered reign. He believes his table E.2 on pp. 338-9<br />

supports this. However, as will be demonstrated in the discussion below, there is no<br />

evidence whatsoever in support of these peculiar ideas. His table bristles with serious<br />

mistakes from beginning to end.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Planet Saturn has a revolution of c. 29.46 years, which means that it returns to the same<br />

place among the stars at the same time of the year after twice 29.46 or nearly 59 years. Due to<br />

the revolution of the earth round the sun, Saturn disappears behind the sun for a few weeks<br />

and reappears again at regular intervals of 378.09 days. This means that its last and first<br />

visibility occurs only once a year at most, each year close to 13 days later in a solar year of<br />

365.2422 days, and close to 24 days later in a lunar year of 354.3672 days (12 months of<br />

29.5306 days), except, of course, in years with an intercalary month.<br />

EXAMINATION OF THE ENTRIES FOR THE FIRST 7 YEARS (14<br />

LINES)<br />

On the above-mentioned tablet each year is covered by two lines, one for the last and one<br />

for the first visibility of the planet. <strong>The</strong> tablet, then, contains 2 x 14 = 28 lines. As lines 3<br />

and 4 are clearly dated to the 2 nd year, the damaged and illegible sign for the year number in<br />

lines 1 and 2 obviously refers to the 1 st year of king Kandalanu.<br />

<strong>The</strong> text of lines 1 and 2:<br />

1´ [Year 1 of Kand]alanu, ´month´ […, day …, last appearance.]<br />

2´ [Year 1, mont]h 4, day 24, in fro[nt of … the Crab, first appearance.]<br />

Comments:<br />

As is seen, the last and first visibility of Saturn is dated to year, month, and day in the lunar<br />

calendar of the Babylonians. As the Babylonian lunar months began in the evening of the<br />

first visibility of the moon after conjunction, there are two mutually independent cycles that<br />

can be combined to test the correctness of the chronology: the lunar first visibility cycle of<br />

29.53 days, and the Saturn visibility cycle of 378.09 days. 57 Saturn cycles of 378.09 days<br />

make almost exactly 59 solar years. As explained by C. B. F. Walker, the translator of the<br />

tablet:<br />

“A complete cycle of Saturn phenomena in relation to the stars takes 59<br />

years. But when that cycle has to be fitted to the lunar calendar of 29 or 30 days then<br />

identical cycles recur at intervals of rather more than 17 centuries. Thus there is no<br />

difficulty in determining the date of the present text.” – C. B. F. Walker,<br />

“Babylonian Observations of Saturn during the Reign of Kandalanu,” in N.<br />

M. Swerdlow (ed.), Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination (Cambridge,<br />

Massachusetts, and London: 1999), p. 63. Emphasis added. (Walker’s article,<br />

with picture, is available on the web:<br />

http://www.caeno.org/_Eponym/pdf/Walker_Saturn%20in%20Kandalanu<br />

%20reign.pdf.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!