25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A critical review of Rolf Furuli’s 2 nd volume on chronology:<br />

Assyrian, Babylonian and Egyptian <strong>Chronology</strong>. Volume II<br />

of Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian, and Persian<br />

<strong>Chronology</strong> Compared with the <strong>Chronology</strong> of the Bible<br />

(Oslo: Awatu Publishers, 2007).<br />

Part I: <strong>The</strong> astronomical “diary” VAT 4956<br />

Rolf Furuli’s new book on chronology, Assyrian, Babylonian and Egyptian <strong>Chronology</strong> (Oslo:<br />

Awatu Publishers, 2007), covers 368 pages. Chapter 6 (pages 94-123) and Appendix C (266-<br />

325), which together cover 90 pages or about 25 percent of the book, are devoted to an<br />

attempt to overcome the evidence provided by the astronomical cuneiform tablet VAT<br />

4956, dated to the 37 th year of Nebuchadnezzar II.<br />

VAT 4956 is a so-called astronomical “diary” that records the positions of the moon and<br />

the five planets visible to the naked eye observed during the 37 th year of Nebuchadnezzar.<br />

About 30 of these records are so well preserved that they can be checked by modern<br />

computations. <strong>The</strong>se computations have confirmed that the 37 th year of Nebuchadnezzar<br />

corresponds to year 568/567 BCE (spring-to-spring).<br />

HAS VAT 4956 BEEN “TAMPERED WITH” IN MODERN TIMES?<br />

Furuli dedicates a substantial part of his discussion to arguing that the cuneiform signs on<br />

the tablet have been “deliberately tampered with” in modern times. In particular he claims<br />

that the signs for “year 37” at the beginning of the text in line 1 on the obverse of the tablet<br />

and the signs for “year 38” and “year 37” in the concluding lines at the lower edge on the<br />

reverse seem to have been “incised” by someone in modern times. He also claims that the<br />

signs for the name “Nebuchadnezzar” in line 1 on the obverse have been manipulated.<br />

After a lengthy analysis Furuli presents the following hypothesis on pages 285, 286:<br />

484

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!