25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

444 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

“<strong>The</strong> thought may be paraphrased: ‘With respect to the desolation of<br />

Jerusalem, 70 years must be completed’.” (E. J. Young, <strong>The</strong> Prophecy of<br />

Daniel, Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., 1949, pp. 183, 184)<br />

In view of Daniel’s reference to and dependence on the statements of<br />

Jeremiah (25:12; 29:10-12), the text could as well be understood to mean that,<br />

with respect to the desolate state of Jerusalem, the predicted 70 years of<br />

Babylonian dominion must be completed before the exiles could return to<br />

Jerusalem to bring its desolation to an end. <strong>The</strong> grammar clearly allows this<br />

meaning. <strong>The</strong>re is no reason to believe that Daniel reinterpreted the clear<br />

statements of Jeremiah, as is required by Furuli’s interpretation of the text.<br />

It is obvious that Daniel links the 70 years to the desolate state of Jerusalem.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole discussion in GTR 4 , Ch. 5, C is based on this. But the fact that<br />

Daniel links or ties the one period to the other is not the same as equating or<br />

identifying the one with the other. To link and to equate are two different things.<br />

In GTR 4 , Ch. 5, C-3, ftn. 33, the following literal translation of Daniel 9:2 is<br />

quoted, based on a detailed grammatical analysis of the text by a Danish<br />

colleague of mine, who is a professional linguistic scholar with an intimate<br />

knowledge of Biblical Hebrew:<br />

“In his [Darius’] first regnal year, I, Daniel, ascertained, in the<br />

writings, that the number of years, which according to the word of<br />

JHWH to Jeremiah the prophet would be completely fulfilled, with<br />

respect to the desolate state of Jerusalem, were seventy years.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> linguist ended his analysis of Daniel’s statement by making the<br />

following precise distinction:<br />

“This statement in no way proves that Jerusalem itself would lay<br />

desolate for 70 years, only that this time period would be fulfilled before<br />

the city could be freed and rebuilt.”<br />

Other knowledgeable and careful Hebraists have made the same distinction.<br />

In a lengthy comment about Daniel 9:2, Professor Carl F. Keil pointed to the<br />

dependence of the wording of Daniel 9:2 on Jeremiah 25:9-12 and explained:<br />

“With l e mal’ot (to fulfil) the contents of the words of Jehovah, as given<br />

by Jeremiah, are introduced. l e chorbot does not stand for the accusative: to<br />

cause to be complete the desolation of Jerusalem (Hitzig), but l e signifies<br />

in respect of, with regard to. This expression does not lean on Jer. xxix.<br />

10 (Kran.), but on Jer. xxv. 12 (‘when seventy years are accomplished’).<br />

charabôt, properly, desolated places, ruins, here a desolated condition. Jerusalem<br />

did not certainly lie in ruins for seventy years; the word is not thus to be interpreted,<br />

but is chosen partly with reference to the words of Jer. xxv. 9, 11. Yet the<br />

desolation began with the first taking of Jerusalem, and the deportation<br />

of Daniel and his companions and a part of the sacred vessels of the<br />

temple, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim (606 [error for 605] B.C.).<br />

Consequently, in the first year of the reign of Darius the Mede over the kingdom<br />

of the Chaldeans the seventy years prophesied of by Jeremiah were now full, the period<br />

of the desolation of Jerusalem determined by God was almost expired.” (C. F. Keil,<br />

Commentary on the Old Testament, Vol. IX, pp. 321-322; emphasis added)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!