25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> 20 th Year of Artaxerxes 387<br />

In support of the claim that Artaxerxes ruled for 51 years instead<br />

of 41, the Watch Tower Society refers to two tablets dated to his<br />

”50 th ” year and ”51 st ” year, respectively. <strong>The</strong> first tablet, listed as<br />

BM 65494 in E. Leichty and A.K. Grayson, Catalogue of the<br />

Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, Vol. VII (London, 1987), is<br />

still unpublished. <strong>The</strong> second tablet, CBM 12803 (= BE 8/1, 127),<br />

on the other hand, was published in 1908 by Albert T. Clay in <strong>The</strong><br />

Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania, Series A:<br />

Cuneiform Texts, Vol. VIII, text 127. All authorities on Achaemenid<br />

history agree that both of these cuneiform tablets contain scribal<br />

errors.<br />

As the Watch Tower Society points out, the tablet published by<br />

Albert Clay is double-dated. <strong>The</strong> date on the tablet is given as,<br />

”51st year, accession year, 12th month, day 20, Darius, king of<br />

lands.” (Insight, p. 616) This text, then, seems to equate the 51st<br />

year (evidently of Artaxerxes I; the name is not given in the text)<br />

with the accession-year of his successor Darius II.<br />

But once again, the Watch Tower Society does not tell the whole<br />

truth. <strong>The</strong> reason is, that the whole truth changes the picture<br />

completely. Many dated tablets are extant from the end of<br />

Artaxerxes’ reign, thanks to the discovery of a cuneiform archive<br />

from the Murashu firm. In Istanbul Murashu Texts (Istanbul, 1997),<br />

V. Donbaz and M. W. Stolper explain that the Murashu archive is<br />

”the largest available documentary source for Achaemenid<br />

Babylonia in the years between Xerxes and Alexander.” (Page 4)<br />

Nearly all of the tablets are dated to the reigns of Artaxerxes I and<br />

his successor Darius II. <strong>The</strong> number culminates in the last two<br />

years of the reign of Artaxerxes and the first seven years of the<br />

reign of Darius II, as shown by the graph below, published by<br />

Donbaz and Stolper on page 6 of the work quoted above. <strong>The</strong><br />

archive includes over 60 texts from the 41st year of Artaxerxes and<br />

the accession year of Darius II, and culminates with about 120<br />

texts dated to the 1st year of Darius II!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!