25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

386 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

contradicts himself several times in this narrative, which shows<br />

that his information on the subject cannot be trusted. (On this, see<br />

the Cambridge Ancient History, V, 1992, p. 14.)<br />

But even if <strong>The</strong>mistocles really may have met Artaxerxes, there is<br />

nothing to show that this occurred in the 470’s. <strong>The</strong>re is no<br />

evidence whatsoever in support of the claim that <strong>The</strong>mistocles died<br />

in 471/70 BC. None of the sources referred to by the Society says<br />

so, and some of them, including Plutarch, clearly show that he died<br />

much later, in about 459 BC. (Plutarch's Lives, XXXI:2–5) A<br />

considerable time passed after the attempt to defame <strong>The</strong>mistocles<br />

in Athens in the archonship of Praxiergus (471/70 BC) until his<br />

interview with Artaxerxes (or Xerxes). It took several attempts<br />

before the enemies of <strong>The</strong>mistocles succeeded and forced him to<br />

flee, first from Athens and finally from Greece. Cambridge Ancient<br />

History (Vol. 5, pp. 62ff.) dates this flight to 569 BC. He first fled to<br />

some friends in Asia Minor, where he stayed for some time. <strong>The</strong><br />

Society quotes Diodorus Siculus in support of the 471/70 date for<br />

the beginning of the defamation of <strong>The</strong>mistocles, but avoids to<br />

mention Diodorus’ statement that, on <strong>The</strong>mistocles’ arrival in Asia<br />

Minor, Xerxes was still on the throne in Persia! (Diodorus Siculus,<br />

XI:54–59) This, of course, conflicts with Thucydides’ statement<br />

that <strong>The</strong>mistocles’ letter from Asia Minor was sent to Artaxerxes.<br />

After some time, evidently after some years, in Asia Minor,<br />

<strong>The</strong>mistocles finally went to Persia. <strong>The</strong>re he first spent one year<br />

studying the language before his meeting with the king. This<br />

meeting may have occured toward the end of 465 BC or early in<br />

464 BC. As historian A. T. Olmstead argues, Xerxes may very well<br />

have been on the throne when <strong>The</strong>mistocles arrived in Persia, but<br />

may have died shortly afterwards, so that <strong>The</strong>mistocles, after his<br />

year of learning the language, met Artaxerxes. In this way the<br />

conflicting statements by the ancient historians may at least<br />

partially be harmonized.<br />

After his meeting with the Persian king, <strong>The</strong>mistocles settled in the<br />

city of Magnesia, where he lived on for some years before he died.<br />

(Plutarch's Lives, XXXI:2–5) It is completely impossible, therefore,<br />

to date his death to 471/70 BC, as done by the Watch Tower<br />

Society.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> two tablets dated to years ”50” and ”51” of<br />

Artaxerxes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!