25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> 20 th Year of Artaxerxes 385<br />

dropped altogether. As Darius died in the 7th month, a tablet<br />

dated to the 9th or 12th month in the accession-year of his<br />

successor is quite all right. <strong>The</strong>re was no overlapping between the<br />

two reigns.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> flight of <strong>The</strong>mistocles<br />

Much has been made in the Watch Tower publications of<br />

<strong>The</strong>mistocles’ flight to Persia. This argument is an old one,<br />

originating with the Jesuit theologian Denis Petau (Petavius) and<br />

archbishop James Ussher in the seventeenth century. It was<br />

presented in great detail by E. W. Hengstenberg in his work<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>ologie des Alten Testaments, published in Berlin in 1832.<br />

According to the Greek historians Thycudides and Charon of<br />

Lampsacus,<br />

Artaxerxes was the king that <strong>The</strong>mistocles spoke with after his<br />

arrival in Persia. <strong>The</strong> Watch Tower Society argues that<br />

<strong>The</strong>mistocles died about 471/70 BC. Artaxerxes, therefore, must<br />

have began his rule before that date and not as late as in 465 BC.<br />

(Insight 2, p. 614) <strong>The</strong>se arguments have a superficial strength, only<br />

because the Watch Tower Society leaves out some very important<br />

information. In proof of their claim that <strong>The</strong>mistocles met<br />

Artaxerxes after his arrival in Persia, they quote Plutarch’s<br />

information that "Thucydides and Charon of Lampsacus relate that<br />

Xerxes was dead, and that it was his son Artaxerxes with whom<br />

<strong>The</strong>mistocles had his interview". But they left out the second part<br />

of Plutarch's statement, which says:<br />

. . . but Ephorus and Dinon and Clitarchus and Heracleides and<br />

yet more besides have it that it was Xerxes to whom he came.<br />

With the chronological data Thucydides seems to me more in<br />

accord, although these are by no means securely established.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Watch Tower Society, then, conceals that Plutarch goes on to<br />

say that a number of ancient historians had written about this<br />

event, and that most of them stated that Xerxes, not Artaxerxes,<br />

was on the throne when <strong>The</strong>mistocles came to Persia. Although<br />

Plutarch (c 46–120 A.D.) felt that Thucydides was more reliable, he<br />

stresses that the chronological data were by no means securely<br />

established. One fact that usually seems to be ignored is that<br />

Thucydides wrote his story about <strong>The</strong>mistocles’ flight some time<br />

after 406 BC, or about two generations after the event. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!