25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE 20TH YEAR OF ARTAXERXES<br />

AND THE "SEVENTY WEEKS" OF DANIEL<br />

<strong>The</strong> questions about the chronology of the reign of Artaxerxes I<br />

and its supposed relation to the 70 weeks of Daniel 9:24–27 would<br />

require a minor book to answer, and such a book is, in fact, what I<br />

have been planning to write for some years. I have been collecting<br />

material on the subject for many years, and in 1989 I even wrote a<br />

brief draft in Swedish. Other projects, however, have occupied my<br />

spare time since then, and I don’t expect to be able to resume the<br />

work on the 70 weeks within the next few years. <strong>The</strong> following<br />

discussion is an examination of the arguments brought forth by the<br />

Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society in support of the idea that<br />

Artaxerxes I acceeded to the throne in 475 BC, not in 465 BC as is<br />

held by modern historians.<br />

What follows is a brief summary of the Swedish paper on the<br />

chronology of Artaxerxes’ reign.<br />

1. Was Xerxes a coregent with his father Darius?<br />

It is true that the Watch Tower Society attempts to solve the<br />

problems created by their prolongation of Artaxerxes’ length reign<br />

from 41 to 51 years (his accession being dated to 475 instead of<br />

465 BC) by abbreviating the reign of his predecessor Xerxes (485–<br />

465 BC) from 21 to 11 years, arguing that the first 10 years of<br />

Xerxes’ rule was a co-rule with his father Darius.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is not the slightest evidence in support of such a coregency.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Watch Tower Society’s discussion on pages 614–616 of its<br />

Bible dictionary Insight on the Scriptures, volume 2 (1988), is a<br />

miserable distortion of the historical evidence. Thus, on page 615<br />

they claim:<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is solid evidence for a coregency of Xerxes with his<br />

father Darius. <strong>The</strong> Greek historian Herodotus (VII, 3) says:<br />

"Darius judged his [Xerxes’] plea [for kingship] to be just and<br />

declared him king. But to my thinking Xerxes would have been<br />

made king even without this advice." This indicates that Xerxes<br />

was made king during the reign of his father Darius.<br />

If we look up Herodotus’ statement, however, we will discover that<br />

he, in the very next few sentences, directly contradicts the Watch<br />

Tower Society's claim that there was a ten year long coregency of<br />

382

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!