25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 365<br />

containing lists of lunar and planetary positions at regular intervals.<br />

(See above, p. 156.) Such arithmetical tables were termed<br />

“ephemerides” by Professor Otto Neugebauer, who published all<br />

extant tablets of this kind in his three-volume work, Astronomical<br />

Cuneiform Texts (1955). All these tablets are late, almost all dating<br />

from the 3rd to the 1st centuries B.C.E.<br />

Does this mean, then, that all or most of the phenomena<br />

recorded on the astronomical tablets might have been computed<br />

rather than observed, as Furuli claims? Were the Babylonian<br />

astronomers able to do this? Are there indications in the recorded<br />

data that they did just that?<br />

(C-.1) Phenomena the Babylonian astronomers were<br />

unable to calculate<br />

Although the Babylonian astronomers were able to calculate<br />

and predict certain astronomical events, the observational texts —<br />

diaries, planetary texts, and eclipse texts — contain reports of<br />

several phenomena and circumstances connected with the<br />

observations that could not have been calculated.<br />

That the diaries usually record real observations is shown by their<br />

reports of climatological phenomena. For example, the scribes<br />

repeatedly report when bad weather prevented astronomical<br />

observations. We often find reports about “clouds and rain of<br />

various sorts, described in detail by numerous technical terms, as<br />

well as fog, mist, hail, thunder, lightning, winds from all directions,<br />

often cold, and frequent ‘pisan dib’, of unknown meaning but always<br />

associated with rain.” 98 Other recorded phenomena were rainbows,<br />

solar halos and river levels. None of these could have been<br />

retrocalculated much later. What, then, about the astronomical<br />

phenomena?<br />

As discussed in chapter 4 of the present work (p. 185 above),<br />

there were a number of planetary phenomena recorded in the texts<br />

that the Babylonian astronomers were unable to calculate. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

included conjunctions of planets with the moon and other planets,<br />

with their distances. VAT 4956 records a number of such — for<br />

the Babylonian astronomers — unpredictable and incalculable<br />

phenomena.<br />

With respect to lunar eclipses, the Babylonian astronomers were<br />

certainly able to predict and retrocalculate the occurrences of lunar<br />

98 N. M. Swerdlow, <strong>The</strong> Babylonian <strong>The</strong>ory of the Planets (1998), p. 18.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!