25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

364 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

visibility of a heavenly body above the horizon), which in turn<br />

could have changed the date of the first and last visibility of a<br />

heavenly body by a day or two.<br />

It should be emphasized that this might possibly be a problem<br />

with astronomical texts that report only phenomena close to the<br />

horizon. Observations of lunar and planetary positions related to<br />

specific stars and constellations higher in the sky would not be<br />

affected, and it is usually these that are the most useful for<br />

chronological purposes. Most of the about 30 lunar and planetary<br />

positions recorded on the astronomical tablet VAT 4956 belong to<br />

this category.<br />

None of Furuli’s “potential sources of error” weakens the<br />

reliability of VAT 4956. I am aware of only one scholar who has<br />

tried to overcome the evidence provided by this diary, namely, E.<br />

W. Faulstich, founder and director of the <strong>Chronology</strong>-History<br />

Research Institute in Spencer, Iowa, USA. Faulstich believes it is<br />

possible to establish an absolute Bible chronology without the aid<br />

of extra-Biblical sources, based solely on the cyclical phenomena of<br />

the Mosaic law (sabbath days, sabbath and jubilee years) and the<br />

cycle of the 24 sections of the levitical priesthood. One<br />

consequence of his theory is that the whole Neo-Babylonian period<br />

has to be moved backward one year. Because this conflicts with the<br />

absolute dating of the period based on the astronomical tablets,<br />

Faulstich argues that VAT 4956 contains information from two<br />

separate years mixed into one. This idea, however, is based on<br />

serious mistakes. I have thoroughly refuted Faulstich’s thesis in the<br />

unpublished article, “A critique of E. W. Faulstich’s Neo-<br />

Babylonian chronology” (1999), available from me upon request.<br />

(C) Are most astronomical positions calculated rather<br />

than observed?<br />

<strong>The</strong> “most acute problem for making an absolute chronology<br />

based on astronomica1 tablets,” Furuli claims, is that many,<br />

“perhaps most positions of the heavenly bodies on such tablets, are<br />

calculated rather than observed.” (p. 15) Is this true?<br />

As discussed in chapter 4 of the present work (pp. 154–156<br />

above), Babylonian astronomers at an early stage were able to<br />

predict certain astronomical phenomena, such as the occurrences<br />

of lunar eclipses and certain planetary positions. <strong>The</strong>se calculations<br />

presuppose that they had worked out theories for dating and<br />

locating such phenomena. In fact, about 300 texts have been found

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!