25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Month-day-year:<br />

VII -- 19 — acc.<br />

VIII -- 10 — 17<br />

IX -- xx — 17<br />

XII -- 19 — 17<br />

King:<br />

Cyrus<br />

Nabonidus<br />

Nabonidus<br />

Nabonidus<br />

Appendix 357<br />

Furuli concludes:<br />

If one or more of the three tablets dated in months 8 and 12 of<br />

Nabonid are correct, this suggests that Nabonid reigned longer than 17<br />

years. (p. 132)<br />

But none of the three “overlapping dates” are real.<br />

(A-1) Nabonidus “VIII —10 — 17” (BM 74972):<br />

As Furuli explains, PD rejected this date because “the month<br />

sign is shaded” in J. N. Strassmaier’s copy of the text published in<br />

1889. 81 <strong>The</strong>y had good reasons for doing this because F. H.<br />

Weissbach, who collated the tablet in 1908, explained that the<br />

month name was highly uncertain and “in any case not<br />

Arahsamnu” (month VIII). 82<br />

Actually, there is an even more serious error with the date. Back<br />

in 1990 I asked C. B. F. Walker at the British Museum to take<br />

another look at the date on the original tablet. He did this together<br />

with two other Assyriologists. <strong>The</strong>y all agreed that the year is 16,<br />

not 17. Walker says:<br />

On the Nabonidus text no. 1054 mentioned by Parker and<br />

Dubberstein p. 13 and Kugler, SSB I1388, I have collated that tablet (BM<br />

74972) and am satisfied that the year is 16, not 17. It has also been<br />

checked by Dr. G. Van Driel and Mr. Bongenaar, and they both agree<br />

with me. 83<br />

(A-2) Nabonidus “IX — xx —17” (No. 1055 in<br />

Strassmaier, Nabonidus):<br />

This text does not give any day number, the date above just<br />

being given as “Kislimu [= month IX], year 17 of Nabonidus”. <strong>The</strong><br />

text, in fact, contains four different dates of this kind, in the<br />

following chronological disorder: Months IX, I, XII, and VI of<br />

“year 17 of Nabonidus”. None of these dates refers to the time<br />

when the tablet was drawn up. Such a date is actually missing on<br />

81 PD ( Parker & Dubberstein’s Babylonian <strong>Chronology</strong>, 1956), p. 13. <strong>The</strong> tablet is<br />

listed as No. 1054 in J. N. Strassmaier, Inschriften von Nabonidus, König von<br />

Babylon (Leipzig, 1889).<br />

82 See F. X. Kugler, Sternkunde und Sterndienst in Babel [SSB], Vol. II:2 (1912), p.<br />

388<br />

83 Letter Walker to Jonsson, November 13, 1990.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!