25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

Kislev he marched about victoriously in Hattu. All the kings of<br />

Hattu came into his presence and he received their vast tribute.”<br />

From April/May 603 onwards:<br />

”<strong>The</strong> se[cond year]: In the month of Iyyar the king of<br />

Akkad strenghtened his large army and [marched to Hattu].<br />

He encamped [ . . . ] . . . large siege towers he moved acr[oss<br />

… …from the month] Iyyar until the month [ . . . he marched<br />

about victoriously in Hattu].”<br />

In 602:<br />

”[<strong>The</strong> third year: In the month . . ., on] the thirteenth [day]<br />

Nabu-shumu-lishir [ . . . ] [In the month . . . the king of Akkad<br />

mustered his army and [marched] to Hattu. [ . . . . . . ] He brought<br />

the vast [booty] of Hattu into Akkad.”<br />

In 601 (march against Egypt in Kislev = Nov./Dec.):<br />

”<strong>The</strong> fourth year: <strong>The</strong> king of Akkad mustered his army and<br />

marched to Hattu. [He marched about victoriously] in Hattu. In<br />

the month Kislev he took his army’s lead and marched to Egypt.<br />

[When] the king of Egypt heard (the news) he m[ustered] his army.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y fought one another in the battle-field and both sides<br />

suffered severe losses (literally, they inflicted a major defeat upon<br />

one another). <strong>The</strong> king of Akkad and his army [went back] to<br />

Babylon.” 64<br />

From this chronicle it is seen that the whole Hattu-territory<br />

(primarily Syria-Lebanon but extending to Phoenicia and Palestine)<br />

became tributary to Nebuchadnezzar as of his accession year. And<br />

in Nebuchadnezzar’s first year it is explicitly stated that “all the<br />

kings of Hattu” were tributary to him, which reasonably cannot<br />

have excepted Jehoiakim.<br />

Many scholars conclude that Nebuchadnezzar’s fourth year, in<br />

which Insight on the Scriptures supposes that Jehoiakim’s Babylonian<br />

vassalage began, was probably the year in which Jehoiakim revolted<br />

against Nebuchadnezzar, because in that year Nebuchadnezzar<br />

battled with Egypt, and both seem to have suffered great losses.<br />

Nebuchadnezzar had to return to Babylon, where he remained in<br />

the fifth year and “refitted his numerous horses and chariotry.” 65<br />

This unsuccessful battle with Egypt may have encouraged<br />

64 A. K. Grayson, Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles (New York: J. J. Augustin<br />

Publisher, 1975), pp. 100–101. <strong>The</strong> square brackets indicate damages in the text.<br />

65 Ibid., p. 101.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!