25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 339<br />

Daniel use this curious way of reckoning regnal years only in this<br />

passage of his book? No other arguments are proposed for this<br />

new position except this statement:<br />

Here again, as at Daniel 1:1, the peculiarity which the writer of<br />

this book has of making a secondary reckoning of the years of a<br />

king’s reign is demonstrated. He reckons by counting from<br />

epochal events within the reign that put the king in a new<br />

relationship. 63<br />

<strong>The</strong>re could hardly be a more obvious example of circular<br />

reasoning.<br />

<strong>The</strong> date of Jehoiakim’s rebellion<br />

<strong>The</strong> latest discussion of these problems is found in the Watch<br />

Tower Society’s Bible dictionary Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 1<br />

(1988), pages 1268–69. Daniel 1:1 is still interpreted as meaning the<br />

third year of Jehoiakim’s vassalage to Babylon, beginning at the end<br />

of his eighth year of reign and ending in his eleventh and last year.<br />

On page 480 of Vol. 2 of the same work, an attempt is made to<br />

find support for this in the Babylonian chronicle B.M. 21946. After<br />

recording the battle of Carchemish in Nebuchadnezzar’s accession<br />

year, this chronicle refers to several succeeding campaigns in the<br />

Hattu-area by Nebuchadnezzar, in his first, second, third and<br />

fourth years. Mentioning these campaigns, the Society’s dictionary<br />

says that “evidently in the fourth year he made Judean King<br />

Jehoiakim his vassal. (2 Kings 24:1)”<br />

This conclusion, however, is not supported by the Babylonian<br />

Chronicle. On the contrary, this chronicle indicates that<br />

Jehoiakim’s vassalage to Babylon began in Nebuchadnezzar’s<br />

accession-year, or possibly in his first year, and that in the fourth<br />

year Jehoiakim was already in open revolt against Babylon. To<br />

demonstrate this, it is necessary to quote important parts of the<br />

Babylonian Chronicle, from the accession year to the fourth year of<br />

Nebuchadnezzar:<br />

Events from c. Sept./Oct. 605 to Jan./Feb. 604 B.C.E.:<br />

”In (his) accession year Nebuchadnezzar (II) returned to<br />

Hattu. Until the month Shebat he marched about victoriously in<br />

Hattu. In the month Shebat he took the vast booty of Hattu to<br />

Babylon.”<br />

From May/June to Nov./Dec. 604:<br />

”<strong>The</strong> first year of Nebuchadnezzar (II): In the month of Sivan<br />

he mustered his army and marched to Hattu. Until the month<br />

63 Equipped for Every Good Work, p. 227.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!