25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 325<br />

Marduk’s accession-year, and that either Nebuchadnezzar ruled for<br />

more than forty-three years or there was another, unknown king<br />

between them.<br />

Such assumptions, however, are disproved by the Bible itself. A<br />

comparison of 2 Kings 24:12 and 2 Chronicles 36:10 with Jeremiah<br />

52:28 shows that Jehoiachin’s exile began toward the end of<br />

Nebuchadnezzar’s seventh regnal year. This would mean that at the<br />

death of Nebuchadnezzar in his forty-third year Jehoiachin had<br />

spent almost thirty-six years in exile (43-7=36), and that the thirtyseventh<br />

year of exile began later in that same year, in the accessionyear<br />

of Awel-Marduk (Evil-Merodach). And this is exactly what we<br />

are told in Jeremiah 52:31:<br />

But in the thirty-seventh year of the exile of Jehoiachin king of<br />

Judah, in the twelfth month, on the twenty-fifth day of the month,<br />

Evil-merodach king of Babylon, in the year he came to the throne,<br />

pardoned Jehoiachin king of Judah and released him from<br />

prison.—Jerusalem Bible. (Compare 2 Kings 25:27.)<br />

Clearly, the Bible does not allow for any additional years<br />

between the forty-third year of Nebuchadnezzar and the accessionyear<br />

of Awel-Marduk.<br />

Overlap Awel-Marduk/Neriglissar?<br />

Before the publication of the CBT catalogues in 1986–88 (see p.<br />

321, note 20), the latest tablet known from the reign of Awel-<br />

Marduk was dated V/17/2 (Aug. 7, 560 B.C.E.), while the first tablet<br />

from the reign of his successor Neriglissar was dated V/21/acc.<br />

(Aug. 11, 560 B.C.E.). Only four days, then, separated the latest<br />

tablet from Awel-Marduk’s reign from the first tablet dated to<br />

Neriglissar. 31<br />

In the CBT catalogues, however, there are two texts that seem<br />

to create a considerable overlap between the reigns of Awel-<br />

Marduk and Neriglissar. <strong>The</strong> first (BM 61325) is from the reign of<br />

Awel-Marduk and is dated to the tenth month of his second regnal<br />

year (X/19/2), or about five months later than the latest tablet<br />

previously known from his reign. 32<br />

This overlap of five months with the reign of Neriglissar is<br />

further extended by the second text, BM 75489, which is dated to<br />

31 Ronald H. Sack, “Nergal-sharra-usur, King of Babylon as seen in the Cuneiform,<br />

Greek, Latin and Hebrew Sources ,” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, Vol. 68 (Berlin,<br />

1978), p. 132.<br />

32 CBT VII, p.36. <strong>The</strong> catalogue has day “17”, which is corrected to “19” in Walker’s<br />

list.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!