25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 317<br />

However, if it is accepted that Daniel was living in Babylon in<br />

the Neo-Babylonian period and was occupying a high rank in its<br />

administration, it would have been natural for him to apply the<br />

Babylonian calendar and their system of reckoning regnal years,<br />

and to do this as well when referring to the reigns of non-<br />

Babylonian kings, including Jehoiakim, just as Jeremiah, living in<br />

Judea, conversely applied the Jewish nonaccession year system in<br />

referring to Nebuchadnezzar’s reign.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Babylonian calendar was also used (alongside the<br />

Egyptian civil calendar) by the Jewish colony at Elephantine in s.<br />

Egypt from the 5th century onward, as has been established by Dr.<br />

Bezalel Porten and others. Dr. Sacha Stern concludes that, “Non-<br />

Jewish or ‘official’ calendars were routinely used by Diaspora Jews<br />

throughout the whole of Antiquity.” 12<br />

Several difficult problems in Biblical chronology are easily<br />

solved if the accession and nonaccession year systems are taken<br />

into consideration. A study of the chronological tables in the final<br />

section of this Appendix (“Chronological tables covering the<br />

seventy years”) will make this clear.<br />

Nisan and Tishri years<br />

It is well established that the Assyrian, Babylonian and Persian<br />

calendar started on Nisan 1 (the first day of the month Nisan in the<br />

spring), which was also the beginning of the regnal years. <strong>The</strong> Jews,<br />

in later times, had two beginnings of their calendar years: Nisan 1<br />

in the spring and Tishri 1 six months later in the autumn—Tishri 1<br />

being the older new-year day. 13 Although Nisan was the beginning<br />

of the sacred calendar year, and the months were always numbered<br />

from it, 14 Tishri was retained as the beginning of the secular calendar<br />

year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem is: Did the kings of Judah follow the custom of<br />

Babylon and other countries in reckoning the regnal years from<br />

Nisan 1, or did they reckon them from Tishri, the beginning of<br />

their secular year? Although scholars disagree on this, there is<br />

evidence to show that the kings of Judah reckoned their regnal<br />

years on a Tishri-to-Tishri basis.<br />

12 Sacha Stern, “<strong>The</strong> Babylonian Calendar at Elephantine,” Zeitschrift far Papyrologie<br />

and Epigraphik, Band 130 (2000), p. 159.<br />

13 J. D. Douglas, ed., New Bible Dictionary, 2nd ed. (Leicester, England : Inter-Varsity<br />

Press, 1982), p. 159; compare Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 1, p. 391.<br />

14 “In the Hebrew Scriptures the months are numbered from Nisan, regardless of<br />

whether the reckoning of the year was from spring or fall.” — Edwin R. Thiele, <strong>The</strong><br />

Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, revised edition (Grand Rapids:<br />

Zondervan Publishing House, 1983), p. 52. In footnote 11 on the same page he<br />

gives many examples of this.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!