25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

<strong>The</strong> compiler of Jeremiah 52, then, faithfully reproduced the<br />

dates found in his two sources, even if those sources reflected two<br />

different ways of reckoning regnal years: the accession year system<br />

used by the Babylonians, and the nonaccession year system used by<br />

the Jews.<br />

<strong>The</strong> last four verses of chapter 52 of Jeremiah (verses 31–34),<br />

although taken verbatim from 2 Kings 25:27–30, also reflects the<br />

accession year system, which may be explained by the fact that the<br />

passage reproduces information that originally must have been<br />

received from Babylonia. As stated in this passage, Evil-merodach<br />

(Awel-Marduk), “in the year of his becoming king,” released the<br />

Judean king Jehoiachin from prison in the 37th year of his exile.<br />

According to Professor Pieters the clause “in the year of his<br />

becoming king” (Jeremiah 52:31) “is the technically correct term<br />

for the year of the monarch’s accession,” 9 the Babylonian<br />

documents using a similar expression when referring to the<br />

accession year.<br />

That the writer of the passage in Jeremiah 52:28–34 used the<br />

accession year system is thus the conclusion of a number of<br />

modern Biblical scholars. 10<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> accession year system is most probably also employed by<br />

the prophet Daniel at Daniel 1:1, where he dates the first<br />

deportation of Jewish exiles to the “third year” of Jehoiakim. This<br />

deportation, however, must have followed upon the battle of<br />

Carchemish, the victory there paving the way for<br />

Nebuchadnezzar’s invasion and conquest of the countries in the<br />

west, including Judah.<br />

As noted above, this battle is dated at Jeremiah 46:2 to the ‘fourth<br />

year” of Jehoiakim, not to his third. Most commentators, therefore,<br />

choose to regard the “third year” of Daniel 1:1 as a historical<br />

blunder by the author of the book, and as indicating that he was<br />

not contemporary with the event, but was writing hundreds of<br />

years afterwards. Some, including the Watch Tower Society, argue<br />

that the deportation mentioned in the text was identical with the<br />

one that occurred eight years later, after the end of Jehoiakim’s<br />

11th year of reign, when his son and successor Jehoiachin was<br />

exiled to Babylon. 11<br />

9 Pieters, op. cit., p. 184.<br />

10 See, for example, John Bright, <strong>The</strong> Anchor Bible: Jeremiah (N.Y.: Doubleday, 1965),<br />

p. 369; J. A. Thompson, op. cit., p.782, and J. Philip Hyatt, “New Light on<br />

Nebuchadnezzar and Judean History,” Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 75 (1956),<br />

p. 278.<br />

11 Insight an the Scriptures, Vol. 1 (Brooklyn, New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract<br />

Society of New York, Inc., 1988), p. 1269. A detailed examination of this theory is<br />

presented in the Appendix for Chapter Five: “<strong>The</strong> ‘third year of Jehoiakim’ (Daniel<br />

1:1, 2).”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!