25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 315<br />

the son of Josiah, king of Judah.” According to Jeremiah 25:1 “the<br />

fourth year of Jehoiakim . . . was the first year of Nebuchadnezzar.”<br />

But the Neo-Babylonian Chronicle 5 (B.M. 21946) clearly states that<br />

this battle took place in Nebuchadnezzar’s accession year, not in his<br />

first year. 6 <strong>The</strong> reason why Jeremiah reckons Nebuchadnezzar’s<br />

accession year as his first year seems to be that Judah did not apply<br />

the accession year system. Jeremiah, therefore, applied the Jewish<br />

non-accession year system not only to Jehoiakim, but also to<br />

Nebuchadnezzar.<br />

2. In 2 Kings 24:12; 25:8, and Jeremiah 52:12 Jehoiachin’s<br />

deportation and the destruction of Jerusalem are said to have taken<br />

place in Nebuchadnezzar’s eighth and nineteenth regnal years, while<br />

Jeremiah 52:28–30 seems to put these events in Nebuchadnezzar’s<br />

seventh and eighteenth years, respectively. <strong>The</strong> difference in both cases<br />

is one year. <strong>The</strong> Neo-Babylonian Chronicle 5 is in agreement with<br />

Jeremiah 52:28 in stating that Nebuchadnezzar seized Jerusalem<br />

and captured Jehoiachin in his seventh year.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is evidence to show that the last chapter of Jeremiah,<br />

chapter 52, was not authored by Jeremiah himself. This is clearly<br />

indicated by the concluding statement of the preceding chapter<br />

(Jeremiah 51:64): “Thus far are the words of Jeremiah.” Chapter<br />

52, in fact, is almost word for word taken from 2 Kings 24:18–<br />

25:30, the only exception being Jeremiah 52:28–30, the verses containing<br />

the divergence of one year in the reference to Nebuchadnezzar’s<br />

regnal years. 7 Professor Albertus Pieters in all probability gives the<br />

correct explanation of this difference when he states:<br />

This difference is perfectly explained if we assume that the<br />

section in question was added to the prophecies of Jeremiah by<br />

someone in Babylon who had access to an official report or record,<br />

in which the date would, of course, be set down according to the<br />

Babylonian reckoning. 8<br />

6 <strong>The</strong> Neo-Babylonian chronicles are discussed in Chapter Three, section B-1.<br />

7 It cannot be determined whether chapter 52 was added by Jeremiah himself, his<br />

scribe Baruch, or some other person. <strong>The</strong> reason why this section from 2 Kings<br />

was included may have been “to show how Jeremiah’s prophecies were fulfilled.”—<br />

Dr. J. A. Thompson, <strong>The</strong> Book of Jeremiah (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdman’s<br />

Publishing Co., 1980), pp. 773, 774.<br />

8 Albertus Pieters, “<strong>The</strong> Third Year of Jehoiakim,” in From the Pyramids to Paul, ed.<br />

by Lewis Gaston Leary (New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1935), p. 186. That<br />

the information in Jeremiah 52:28–30 may have been added to the book of<br />

Jeremiah in Babylonia is also supported by the fact that the Greek Septuagint<br />

(LXX) version of Jeremiah, which was produced in Egypt (perhaps from a<br />

manuscript preserved by the Jews in that country), does not include these verses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!