25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 313<br />

Although the doctrine of conditional immortality eventually was<br />

adopted by a majority of the Second Adventists, it was never<br />

accepted by the leadership of the original movement, which<br />

increasingly began to condemn it as a heresy in their periodical, the<br />

Advent Herald. Finally, in 1858, the original Second Adventists, or<br />

the “Evangelical Adventists,” as they now called themselves,<br />

openly broke with the “conditionalist” Adventists and formed a<br />

separate organization, <strong>The</strong> American Evangelical Advent Conference. <strong>The</strong><br />

Evangelical Adventists, however, soon became a minority, as their<br />

members in increasing numbers sided with the “conditionalist”<br />

Adventists. <strong>The</strong> association finally died out in the early years of the<br />

20th century. 2<br />

After the break with the Evangelical Adventists, the supporters<br />

of the World’s Crisis, too, formed a separate denomination in 1860,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Advent <strong>Christ</strong>ian Association (later “<strong>The</strong> Advent <strong>Christ</strong>ian<br />

Church”), today the most important Adventist denomination aside<br />

from the Seventh-Day Adventists and Jehovah’s Witnesses. 3<br />

Many “conditionalist” Adventists did not join this association,<br />

however, partly because they were strongly opposed to all forms of<br />

structured church organization and would accept no names of their<br />

church but the “Church of God,” and partly also because of their<br />

distinctive “age to come” views, that is, that the Jews would be<br />

restored to Palestine before the coming of <strong>Christ</strong>, that his coming<br />

would usher in the millenium, and that the saints would reign with<br />

<strong>Christ</strong> for a thousand years, during which period his kingdom<br />

2 David Tallmadge Arthur, “Come out of Babylon”: A Study of Millerite Separatism<br />

and Denominationalism, 1840–1865 (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of<br />

Rochester, 1970), pp. 291–306; Isaac C. Wellcome, History of the Second Advent<br />

Message (Yarmouth [Maine], Boston, New York, London, 1874), pp. 597–600, 609,<br />

610. See also the excellent overview by D. A. Dean, op. cit., pp. 122–129. Even<br />

Joshua V. Himes, editor of the Advent Herald and the most influential leader of the<br />

original movement after the death of Miller in 1849, adopted the “conditionalist”<br />

position in 1862 and left the Evangelical Adventists.<br />

3 Numerically, the membership of this church has remained at about 30,000–50,000<br />

throughout its history. <strong>The</strong> two most influential leaders and writers at the<br />

formation of the association were H. L. Hastings and Miles Grant, the latter being<br />

editor of the World’s Crisis from 1856 to 1876. Hastings left the association in<br />

1865 and remained independent of all associations for the rest of his life, although<br />

he continued to advocate conditionalism and other teachings of the Advent<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>ian denomination. (See Dean, op. cit., pp. 133–135, 142, 210–294.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!