25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> “Seven <strong>Times</strong>” of Daniel 239<br />

the complete fall of <strong>Gentile</strong> governments is not indicated as taking<br />

place till nineteen years later, or in about 1934. 8<br />

So what could be expected to take place in 1934? <strong>The</strong> Herald of<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>’s Kingdom indicated:<br />

<strong>The</strong> reasonable deduction is that the great changes and events<br />

which we have heretofore expected to take place in 1914 would, in<br />

view of the foregoing, be logically expected to be in evidence<br />

somewhere around 1934. 9<br />

Other articles followed in the issues of May 15 and June 1 of<br />

the Herald, giving additional evidence for the necessity of these<br />

changes and answering questions from the readers. <strong>The</strong> changes<br />

evoked much interest among the Bible Students:<br />

Many have freely written us that they have heartily accepted the<br />

conclusions reached. . . .<br />

It has been of special interest to us to receive advice from<br />

brethren in several different quarters telling of how for some<br />

months or years before receiving our recent treatment of the<br />

subject, they had been led to make an exhaustive examination of<br />

the chronology and had arrived at exactly the same conclusions as<br />

those presented in the HERALD with regard to the 19 years<br />

difference in the starting of the <strong>Gentile</strong> <strong>Times</strong> , and found that all<br />

the evidences showed that Nebuchadnezzar’s universal kingdom<br />

began in his first year instead of his nineteenth. 10<br />

A-2: <strong>The</strong> Bible Student controversy on the <strong>Gentile</strong> times<br />

chronology<br />

However, most Bible Student groups rejected the conclusions of<br />

the Pastoral Bible Institute. <strong>The</strong> first counterattack came from P. S.<br />

L. Johnson, the founder of the Laymen’s Home Missionary<br />

Movement and editor of its periodical <strong>The</strong> Present Truth.<br />

8 Ibid., p. 120.<br />

9 Ibid.<br />

10 <strong>The</strong> Herald of <strong>Christ</strong>’s Kingdom, June 1, 1921, p. 163. Interestingly, the November<br />

1, 1921 issue of the Herald published an article prepared by another Bible Student<br />

in 1915, in which he presented evidence and conclusions practically identical to<br />

those of R. E. Streeter, although he dated the destruction of Jerusalem in 588<br />

instead of 587 B.C.E. <strong>The</strong> 588 date was adopted by P.B.I. in subsequent issues of<br />

the Herald. As this man had no connection with P.B.I., he preferred to be<br />

anonymous, signing the article with the initials J.A.D. <strong>The</strong> Beraean Bible Institute,<br />

a Bible Student group with headquarters in Melbourne, Australia, also accepted<br />

the conclusions of the P.B.I. editors, as seen from their People’s Paper of July 1<br />

and September 1, 1921, pp. 52, 68.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!