25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

eleventh and last regnal year (which partly overlapped the seventh year of<br />

Nebuchadnezzar, or his eighth year in the nonaccession-year<br />

system).<br />

But this explanation directly contradicts Daniel 2:1, which shows<br />

Daniel at the court of Nebuchadnezzar and interpreting his dream<br />

of the image already in the “second year” of this king. If Daniel<br />

was brought to Babylon in Nebuchadnezzar’s seventh year, how<br />

could he be there interpreting his dreams in his second year? So, to<br />

save their interpretation, this text, too, had to be changed and made<br />

to say something else besides what it clearly says. Two different<br />

explanations have been offered through the years, the last one<br />

being that in this verse Daniel reckons Nebuchadnezzar’s years<br />

from the destruction of Jerusalem in his eighteenth year.<br />

Nebuchadnezzar’s second year, then, should be understood as his<br />

nineteenth year (the twentieth year in the nonaccession-year system)!<br />

Thus, once again we find that the application of the seventy<br />

years held to by the Watch Tower Society contradicts the Bible,<br />

this time Daniel 1:1–2 and 2:1. In order to uphold its theory, it is<br />

forced to reject the easiest and most direct reading of these texts? 21<br />

That some Jewish captives had already been brought to Babylon<br />

in the year of Nebuchadnezzar’s accession is also confirmed by<br />

Berossus in his Babylonian history written in the third century<br />

B.C.E. His account of the events of this year reads as follows:<br />

Nabopalassaros, his father, heard that the satrap who had been<br />

posted to Egypt, Coele Syria, and Phoenicia, had become a rebel.<br />

No longer himself equal to the task, he entrusted a portion of his<br />

army to his son Nabouchodonosoros, who was still in the prime of<br />

life, and sent him against the rebel. Nabouchodonosoros drew up<br />

his force in battle order and engaged the rebel. He defeated him<br />

and subjected the country to the rule of the Babylonians again. At<br />

this very time Nabopalassaros , his father fell ill and died in the city<br />

of the Babylonians after having been king for twenty-one years.<br />

Nabouchodonosoros learned of his father’s death shortly<br />

thereafter. After he arranged affairs in Egypt and the remaining<br />

territory, he ordered some of his friends to bring the Jewish,<br />

Phoenician, Syrian, and Egyptian prisoners together with the bulk of the army<br />

and the rest of the booty to Babylonia. He himself set out with a few<br />

companions and reached Babylon by crossing the desert. 22<br />

21 For additional comments on Daniel 1:1, 2 and 2:1, see the Appendix for Chapter 5.<br />

22 Stanley Mayer Burstein, <strong>The</strong> Babyloniaca of Berossus (Malibu: Undena<br />

Publications, 1978), pp. 26, 27.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!