25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Absolute <strong>Chronology</strong> of the Neo-Babylonian Era 185<br />

Professor N. M. Swerdlow points out that, although the distances<br />

of planets from normal stars could be predicted, “Conjunctions of<br />

planets with the moon and other planets, with their distances,<br />

could neither be calculated by the ephemerides nor predicted by<br />

periodicities.” 63 With respect to lunar eclipses, the Babylonians<br />

could predict and retrocalculate their occurrences, “but none of the<br />

Babylonian methods could have allowed them to calculate<br />

circumstances such as the direction of the eclipse shadow and the<br />

visibility of planets during the eclipse.” 64<br />

Thus, although the Babylonians were able to calculate certain<br />

astronomical phenomena, the observational texts record a number<br />

of details connected with the observations that they were unable to<br />

predict or retrocalculate. This disproves conclusively the idea<br />

proposed by some that the data may have been calculated<br />

backwards from a later period.<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION<br />

In the previous chapter the length of the Neo-Babylonian era was<br />

firmly established by seven different lines of evidence. All of them<br />

were based upon ancient Babylonian cuneiform texts such as<br />

chronicles, kinglists, royal inscriptions, and tens of thousands of<br />

economic, administrative, and legal documents from the Neo-<br />

Babylonian period.<br />

In this chapter another seven independent evidences have been<br />

presented. All of these are based on ancient Babylonian astronomical<br />

texts, which provide a whole string of absolute dates from the sixth<br />

and seventh centuries B.C.E. <strong>The</strong>se tablets establish—over and<br />

over again—the absolute chronology of the Neo-Babylonian era:<br />

63 N. M. Swerdlow, <strong>The</strong> Babylonian <strong>The</strong>ory of the Planets (Princeton University Press,<br />

1998), pp. 23, 173.—<strong>The</strong> diaries also record a number of other phenomena that<br />

could not be calculated, such as solar halos, river levels, and bad weather—clouds,<br />

rain, fog, mist, hail, lightning, winds, etc. Some data in the diaries were computed<br />

because of bad weather, but most are observations. This is also evident from the<br />

Akkadian name of the diaries engraved at the end of their edges: natsaru sha ginê,<br />

‘regular watching”.<br />

64 Communication J. M. Steele-Jonsson, dated March 27, 2003. As pointed out in<br />

footnote 45 above, there is also a clear difference of accuracy in the timings given<br />

for observed and predicted eclipses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!