25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED<br />

<strong>The</strong> royal name was evidently given only for the first year of<br />

each ruler. But as the immediate predecessor of Cyrus was<br />

Nabonidus, “year 15”, “year 16”, and “year 17” clearly refer to his<br />

reign. <strong>The</strong> inventory of the year following upon “year 17” ends<br />

with the words, “year 1, Cyrus, King of Babylon, King of the<br />

Lands” (line 39). <strong>The</strong> last lines of the entry for the fifth year of<br />

inventory are damaged, and “year 2” (of Cyrus) can only be<br />

understood as implied. 97<br />

11) In ancient Mesopotamia, in the various temples the presence<br />

of the deities was represented by their statues. In times of war,<br />

when a city was taken, the temples were usually looted and the<br />

divine statues were carried away as “captives” to the land of the<br />

conquerors.<br />

As such captures were seen by the citizens as an omen that the<br />

gods had abandoned the city and called for its destruction, they<br />

often tried to protect the statues by moving them to a safer place at<br />

the approach of a military force.<br />

This is what happened shortly before the Persian invasion of<br />

northern Babylonia in 539 B.C.E., when according to the Nabonidus<br />

Chronicle Nabonidus ordered a gathering of the gods of several cities<br />

into Babylon. <strong>The</strong> same chronicle also tells that Cyrus, after the<br />

fall of Babylon, returned the statues to their respective cities. 98<br />

As discussed by Dr. Paul-Alain Beaulieu, there are several<br />

documents from the archive of the Eanna temple of Uruk which<br />

confirm that, in the seventeenth year of Nabonidus, the statue of<br />

Ishtar (referred to in the documents as “Lady-of-Uruk” or “Lady<br />

of the Eanna”) was brought upstream by boat on the river<br />

Euphrates to Babylon. Further, these documents also show that the<br />

regular offerings to this statue of Ishtar were not interrupted during<br />

her temporary stay at Babylon. Cargoes of barley and other kinds<br />

of foodstuff for her cult were sent from Uruk to Babylon.<br />

One example of this is given by a tablet in the Yale Babylonian<br />

Collection, YOS XIX:94, which is dated to the seventeenth year of<br />

Nabonidus and records a deposition before the assembly of the<br />

noblemen of Uruk:<br />

(<strong>The</strong>se are) the mar banî [noblemen] in whose presence Zeriya,<br />

son of Ardiya, has thus spoken: Bazuzu, son of Ibni-Ishtar,<br />

97 Ibid., p. 209. A transliteration of the tablet is given by Karl Oberhuber in his<br />

Sumerische and akkadische Keilschriftdenkmäler des Archäologischen Museums zu<br />

Florenz (= Innsbruck Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, Sonderheft 8, Innsbruck,<br />

1960), pp. 111–113.<br />

98 A. K. Grayson, ABC (1975), pp. 109, 110.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!