25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Length of Reigns of the Neo-Babylonian Kings 135<br />

This inscription, then, interlinks the reigns of Neriglissar and<br />

Labashi-Marduk, and evidently also those of Labashi-Marduk and<br />

Nabonidus. <strong>The</strong> possibility of inserting an “extra king” somewhere<br />

between these three kings is ruled out by this text.<br />

(8) Some legal documents, too, contain information that spans the<br />

reigns of two or more kings. One example is Nabon. No. 13, which<br />

is dated to “the 12th day of (the month) Shabatu [the eleventh<br />

month], the accession year of Nabonidus, king of Babylon<br />

[February 2, 555 B.C.E.]. “ <strong>The</strong> inscription tells about a woman,<br />

Belilitu, who brought up the following case before the royal court:<br />

Belilitu daughter of Bel-ushezib descendant of the messenger<br />

declared the following to the judges of Nabonidus, king of<br />

Babylon: ‘In the month of Abu, the first year of Nergal-shar-usur<br />

[Neriglissar], king of Babylon [August–September, 559 B.C.E.], I<br />

sold my slave Bazuzu to Nabu-ahhe-iddin son of Shula descendent<br />

of Egibi for one-half mina five shekels of silver, but he did not pay<br />

cash and drew up a promissory note.’ <strong>The</strong> royal judges listened (to<br />

her) and commanded that Nabu-ahhe-iddin be brought before<br />

them. Nabu-ahhe-iddin brought the contract that he had<br />

concluded with Belilitu and showed the judges (the document<br />

which indicated that) he had paid the silver for Bazuzu. 92<br />

Reference is thus made to the reigns of Neriglissar and that of<br />

Nabonidus. <strong>The</strong> generally accepted chronology would indicate that<br />

about three and a half years had passed since Belilitu had sold her<br />

slave in the first year of Neriglissar until she, in the accession year<br />

of Nabonidus, made a fraudulent but futile attempt to receive<br />

double payment for the slave. But if twenty years were to be added<br />

somewhere between the reigns of Neriglissar and Nabonidus, then<br />

Belilitu waited for twenty-three and a half years before she brought her<br />

case before the court, something that appears extremely unlikely.<br />

f) Nabonidus to Cyrus<br />

That Nabonidus was the king of Babylon when Cyrus conquered<br />

Babylonia in 539 B.C.E. is clearly shown by the Nabonidus Chronicle<br />

(B.M. 35382) 93 <strong>The</strong> chronicle evidently dated this event<br />

92 M. A. Dandamaev, Slavery in Babylonia (DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois<br />

University Press, 1984), pp. 189, 190.<br />

93 As early as 1877, W. St. Chad Boscawen found a document among the Egibi<br />

tablets dated to the reign of Cyrus, “which stated that money was paid in the reign<br />

of ‘Nabu-nahid the former king’ .” — Transactions of the Society of Biblical<br />

Archaeology, Vol. VI (London, 1878), p. 29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!