25.03.2016 Views

The Gentile Times Reconsidered Chronology Christ

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

An historical and biblical refutation of 1914, a favorite year of Jehovah's Witnesses and other Bible Students. By Carl Olof Jonsson.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Length of Reigns of the Neo-Babylonian Kings 129<br />

B-4: Chronological interlocking joints<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are only two possible ways of extending the Neo-Babylonian<br />

period to include the twenty extra years required by the Watch<br />

Tower chronology:<br />

Either the known Neo-Babylonian kings had longer reigns than<br />

indicated by all the documents discussed above, or there were<br />

other, unknown kings who belonged to the Neo-Babylonian era in<br />

addition to those known to us from these documents.<br />

Both of these possibilities, however, are completely excluded,<br />

not only by the several lines of evidence presented so far and the<br />

astronomical evidence that will be discussed in the next chapter,<br />

but also by a series of texts that inseparably interlock each reign with<br />

the next throughout the whole Neo-Babylonian period. Eleven<br />

such chronological interlocking joints wil1 be discussed below.<br />

a) Nabopolassar to Nebuchadnezzar<br />

(1) In the earlier discussion of the Neo-Babylonian chronicles, one of<br />

them (Chronicle 5) was quoted as saying that Nabopolassar, the first<br />

Neo-Babylonian king, ruled “for twenty-one years,” that he died “on<br />

the eighth day of the month Ab [the fifth month] ,” and that on the first<br />

day of the next month (Elul) his son Nebuchadnezzar “ascended the<br />

royal throne in Babylon.”<br />

At this point, then, there is no room for a longer reign of<br />

Nabopolassar beyond the recognized span of twenty-one years, nor<br />

for an “extra king” between him and Nebuchadnezzar.<br />

b) Nebuchadnezzar to Awel-Marduk<br />

(2) That Nebuchadnezzar was succeeded by his son Awel-Marduk<br />

(the Biblical Evil-Merodach) in the forty-third year of<br />

Nebuchadnezzar’s reign is confirmed by a business document,<br />

B.M. 30254, published by Ronald H. Sack in 1972.<br />

This document mentions both the forty-third year of<br />

Nebuchadnezzar and the accession year of Awel-Marduk. A girl,<br />

Lit-ka-idi, the slave of Gugua, “was placed at the disposal of Nabûahhe-iddina,<br />

the son of Shulâ, the descendent of Egibi in the month<br />

of Ajaru [the second month], forty-third year of Nebuchadnezzar, king of<br />

Babylon, and (for whom) twelve shekels of silver served as<br />

security.” Later in the same year, “in the month of Kislimu [the ninth<br />

month], accession year of [Amel]-Marduk, king of Babylon, . . . Gugua

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!