23.02.2016 Views

STREETSCAPE GUIDANCE

streetscape-guidance

streetscape-guidance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HOME<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

PART A<br />

A vision for London’s streets<br />

PART B<br />

From strategy to delivery<br />

PART C<br />

New measures for new challenges<br />

PART D<br />

Balancing priorities<br />

PART F<br />

Appendix<br />

PART E<br />

Physical design and materials<br />

SECTION 6<br />

Introduction<br />

SECTION 7<br />

High quality footways<br />

SECTION 8<br />

Carriageways<br />

SECTION 9<br />

Crossings<br />

SECTION 10<br />

Kerbside activity<br />

SECTION 11<br />

Footway amenities<br />

SECTION 12<br />

Safety and functionality<br />

SECTION 13<br />

Street environment<br />

SECTION 14<br />

Transport interchanges<br />

Streetscape Guidance<br />

12.4. Barrier free footways<br />

Pedestrian guardrails<br />

Pedestrian guardrails are known to give the<br />

impression of vehicle dominance, clutter, reduce<br />

kerbside activity, increase maintenance and block<br />

major pedestrian desire lines.<br />

We have a presumption against the use of<br />

pedestrian guardrails in new schemes and are<br />

actively removing guardrails where evidence from<br />

a safety audit demonstrates they are not required.<br />

The Local Transport Note LTN 2/09 – Pedestrian<br />

Guardrailing (PGR) notes that, ‘there is no<br />

conclusive evidence that the inclusion of PGR at<br />

any type of pedestrian crossing or junction has any<br />

statistically significant effect on the safety record’.<br />

Designers are encouraged to look at our<br />

Guidance on the Assessment of Pedestrian<br />

Guardrail for additional advice.<br />

Guardrail removal<br />

Streetscape Guidance promotes the removal<br />

of existing guardrails where a proven safety<br />

requirement cannot be demonstrated. Road<br />

safety audits should be undertaken in any<br />

guardrail removal assessment to determine the<br />

safety implications.<br />

Partial removal of guardrails may be<br />

recommended to alleviate pedestrian pinch<br />

points. Guardrails on side roads adjacent to<br />

the TLRN may be located within the borough<br />

boundary, and so approval with the borough<br />

should be sought when requesting removal.<br />

A cycle parking audit should be undertaken<br />

before removal to ascertain if the guardrail is<br />

used for cycle parking. Sufficient replacement<br />

cycle parking stands should be included<br />

accordingly as part of the removal process.<br />

[Part E – Physical design and materials] Safety and functionality 258<br />

Monitoring<br />

Periodic reviews should be undertaken to record<br />

any problems with guardrail removal, especially<br />

relating to collision numbers. This should be<br />

entered into the Traffic Accident Diary System<br />

(TADS) for long-term collision monitoring.<br />

Guardrail retention<br />

• The reinstatement of existing guardrails<br />

requires SDRG approval. Guardrails may<br />

be retained where a road safety audit<br />

confirms that pedestrian desire lines put<br />

pedestrians at risk, or on signalised pedestrian<br />

crossings. Please refer to the Guidance on<br />

the Assessment of Pedestrian Guardrail for<br />

additional advice.<br />

Figure 258: Junction of Lancaster Place and the Strand before and after guardrail removal<br />

Figure 257: Guardrailing often restricts free<br />

movement by non motorised users

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!