STREETSCAPE GUIDANCE
streetscape-guidance
streetscape-guidance
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HOME<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
PART A<br />
A vision for London’s streets<br />
PART B<br />
From strategy to delivery<br />
PART C<br />
New measures for new challenges<br />
PART D<br />
Balancing priorities<br />
PART F<br />
Appendix<br />
PART E<br />
Physical design and materials<br />
SECTION 6<br />
Introduction<br />
SECTION 7<br />
High quality footways<br />
SECTION 8<br />
Carriageways<br />
SECTION 9<br />
Crossings<br />
SECTION 10<br />
Kerbside activity<br />
SECTION 11<br />
Footway amenities<br />
SECTION 12<br />
Safety and functionality<br />
SECTION 13<br />
Street environment<br />
SECTION 14<br />
Transport interchanges<br />
Streetscape Guidance<br />
12.4. Barrier free footways<br />
Pedestrian guardrails<br />
Pedestrian guardrails are known to give the<br />
impression of vehicle dominance, clutter, reduce<br />
kerbside activity, increase maintenance and block<br />
major pedestrian desire lines.<br />
We have a presumption against the use of<br />
pedestrian guardrails in new schemes and are<br />
actively removing guardrails where evidence from<br />
a safety audit demonstrates they are not required.<br />
The Local Transport Note LTN 2/09 – Pedestrian<br />
Guardrailing (PGR) notes that, ‘there is no<br />
conclusive evidence that the inclusion of PGR at<br />
any type of pedestrian crossing or junction has any<br />
statistically significant effect on the safety record’.<br />
Designers are encouraged to look at our<br />
Guidance on the Assessment of Pedestrian<br />
Guardrail for additional advice.<br />
Guardrail removal<br />
Streetscape Guidance promotes the removal<br />
of existing guardrails where a proven safety<br />
requirement cannot be demonstrated. Road<br />
safety audits should be undertaken in any<br />
guardrail removal assessment to determine the<br />
safety implications.<br />
Partial removal of guardrails may be<br />
recommended to alleviate pedestrian pinch<br />
points. Guardrails on side roads adjacent to<br />
the TLRN may be located within the borough<br />
boundary, and so approval with the borough<br />
should be sought when requesting removal.<br />
A cycle parking audit should be undertaken<br />
before removal to ascertain if the guardrail is<br />
used for cycle parking. Sufficient replacement<br />
cycle parking stands should be included<br />
accordingly as part of the removal process.<br />
[Part E – Physical design and materials] Safety and functionality 258<br />
Monitoring<br />
Periodic reviews should be undertaken to record<br />
any problems with guardrail removal, especially<br />
relating to collision numbers. This should be<br />
entered into the Traffic Accident Diary System<br />
(TADS) for long-term collision monitoring.<br />
Guardrail retention<br />
• The reinstatement of existing guardrails<br />
requires SDRG approval. Guardrails may<br />
be retained where a road safety audit<br />
confirms that pedestrian desire lines put<br />
pedestrians at risk, or on signalised pedestrian<br />
crossings. Please refer to the Guidance on<br />
the Assessment of Pedestrian Guardrail for<br />
additional advice.<br />
Figure 258: Junction of Lancaster Place and the Strand before and after guardrail removal<br />
Figure 257: Guardrailing often restricts free<br />
movement by non motorised users