Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ment plans. The highest costs are incurred as a result of the waste stream–related<br />
directives <strong>and</strong> the L<strong>and</strong>fill Directive.<br />
• The strategic framework <strong>for</strong> water has been in place since 2000, when the Water<br />
Framework Directive was adopted. The biggest investment implications in<br />
water in SEE are associated with the Drinking Water <strong>and</strong> the Urban Waste<br />
Water Treatment Directives.<br />
• The Directive on Ambient Air Quality <strong>and</strong> Cleaner Air <strong>for</strong> Europe<br />
(2008/50/EC) merges most of the existing legislation into a single directive<br />
with no change to existing air quality objectives. The main public investment<br />
in air is associated with the establishment of a network of monitoring equipment<br />
while significant private investments will be needed <strong>for</strong> the implementation<br />
of the IPPC <strong>and</strong> LCP Directives.<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> investment needs <strong>and</strong> benefits<br />
The implementation <strong>and</strong> en<strong>for</strong>cement of environmental legislation is one of<br />
the most important areas of work <strong>for</strong> SEE countries in relation to environmental<br />
infrastructure development. As previously indicated, this process requires significant<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts towards the upgrading <strong>and</strong> construction of new environmental facilities<br />
such as wastewater treatment plants <strong>and</strong> sanitary l<strong>and</strong>fills. In order to identify<br />
where the financial challenge will be the most significant, this section looks at investment<br />
needs as required by EU environmental legislation <strong>and</strong> highlights the implementation<br />
<strong>and</strong> investment implications <strong>for</strong> SEE countries.<br />
Benefits <strong>for</strong> South Eastern European countries of compliance<br />
with the environmental acquis<br />
Implementing the EU environmental acquis entails large costs. However, it is important<br />
to bear in mind that the process will also eventually lead to a range of benefits<br />
<strong>for</strong> all sectors of society. In a study commissioned by the EC DG Environment in<br />
2007, the total monetary benefits <strong>for</strong> SEE countries is estimated at between EUR 1.4<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2 billion per year (Arcadis Ecolas NV <strong>and</strong> IEEP, 2007). The total benefits of clean<br />
drinking-water supply <strong>for</strong> SEE countries are estimated to amount to up to EUR 851<br />
million per year upon full compliance. Furthermore, the implementation of the air-related<br />
environmental acquis is expected to lead to approximately 4,475 fewer cases of<br />
premature death from respiratory diseases <strong>and</strong> lung cancer per year.<br />
The calculation is based on direct benefits with respect to public health <strong>and</strong> includes<br />
the reduction of illness <strong>and</strong> mortality, resource benefits (<strong>for</strong> example those<br />
gained from reduced water pre-treatment costs as water quality improves; <strong>for</strong>est products<br />
<strong>and</strong> sustainable agriculture), <strong>and</strong> eco-services gains such as the protection of<br />
species, habitats <strong>and</strong> ecosystems. Wider socioeconomic benefits relate to increased<br />
employment through environmental investments, eco-efficiency gains, the develop-<br />
C H A P T E R 4<br />
E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T A N D T H E E U A C C E S S I O N P R O C E S S<br />
S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 89