Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76<br />
C H A P T E R 4<br />
E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T A N D T H E E U A C C E S S I O N P R O C E S S<br />
S T R AT E G I C M O V E S<br />
On the institutional level, the tasks ahead include strengthening the administration<br />
capacity of national <strong>and</strong> local authorities, clearly defining responsibilities,<br />
identifying investment needs, developing financing strategies <strong>and</strong> implementation<br />
plans, <strong>and</strong> strengthening the capacity of water <strong>and</strong> waste utilities.<br />
Upgrading environmental infrastructure requires major capital investments as<br />
well as joint ef<strong>for</strong>ts by local <strong>and</strong> national authorities. It is estimated that infrastructure<br />
investments will represent more than 2 or 3 percent of SEE countries’<br />
GDP (REC, 2005). National budgets in SEE are currently limited, <strong>and</strong> the share<br />
allocated to the environment is usually small.<br />
Political will is of great importance in the implementation of the wide re<strong>for</strong>ms<br />
needed. Governments in all SEE countries have committed themselves to this objective<br />
<strong>and</strong> are, to varying degrees, implementing re<strong>for</strong>ms. While public opinion in<br />
SEE is largely in favour of EU integration, this support will rapidly be withdrawn<br />
if governments fail to deliver. According to EC Communication 2008/127, societies<br />
remain divided on a few key issues such as the integration of different communities<br />
<strong>and</strong> also, in some cases, constitutional re<strong>for</strong>m. Further ef<strong>for</strong>ts are there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
needed in order to achieve consensus on such issues <strong>and</strong> to proceed with the necessary<br />
political <strong>and</strong> economic re<strong>for</strong>ms (EC COM [2008] 127). Delivering on environmental<br />
infrastructure improvements is an aspect of the EU accession process<br />
that is highly visible <strong>and</strong> that leads to tangible improvements in quality of life.<br />
Experience from the EU accession process in CEE countries illustrates that the<br />
adoption of the acquis raises the importance of the environment on the national<br />
agenda. Lessons learnt show that early in the process focus should be placed on institutional<br />
<strong>and</strong> administrative re<strong>for</strong>m. Hasty <strong>and</strong> insufficiently coordinated transposition<br />
of the acquis has been seen to lead to non-integrated, unclear, complicated<br />
<strong>and</strong> low-quality legislation. Restructuring responsibilities among ministries can reduce<br />
fragmentation <strong>and</strong> lead to good governance.<br />
The road to accession<br />
The EU enlargement process currently covers the countries of SEE, Turkey, <strong>and</strong><br />
more recently Icel<strong>and</strong>. In recent years, SEE countries have moved closer to the EU<br />
<strong>and</strong> have embarked on political, administrative <strong>and</strong> legislative re<strong>for</strong>ms (EC 2008,<br />
IP/08/378). Croatia <strong>and</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have<br />
achieved the status of c<strong>and</strong>idate countries. Accession negotiations with Croatia<br />
started in October 2005. The <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia became a<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idate country in December 2005. In October 2009, the Commission recommended<br />
that negotiations <strong>for</strong> EU accession should be opened. Albania, Bosnia <strong>and</strong><br />
Herzegovina, Kosovo (as defined under UNSCR 1244), Montenegro <strong>and</strong> Serbia<br />
are all potential c<strong>and</strong>idates that have the prospect of beginning EU membership negotiations<br />
when they are ready. Albania submitted its application <strong>for</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idate status<br />
in April 2009 <strong>and</strong> Montenegro in December 2008 (EC COM [2009] 533).