Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 2: Key challenges <strong>and</strong> constraints at municipal level (continued)<br />
Inadequate capacity <strong>for</strong> financial, environmental<br />
<strong>and</strong> investment planning<br />
Many local governments lack the capacity to underst<strong>and</strong> environmental infrastructure<br />
investments in the context of a market economy, including issues of social<br />
af<strong>for</strong>dability, cost recovery, depreciation <strong>and</strong> the appropriate use of subsidies.<br />
They are reluctant to take on loans, either due to legal restrictions on debt servicing<br />
or insecurity about their repayment capacities stemming from inadequate financial<br />
management practices. They there<strong>for</strong>e prioritise investments that can be<br />
serviced by grants or inexpensive soft loans from the central government or <strong>for</strong>eign<br />
donors, rather than real needs driven by rational environmental <strong>and</strong> financial<br />
planning (REC, 2005). In the meantime, necessary but more expensive <strong>and</strong> complex<br />
investments are postponed; the environment <strong>and</strong> society are further degraded;<br />
<strong>and</strong> necessary institutional re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> popular awareness-raising programmes are<br />
not implemented. While not denying that local governments should optimise<br />
funding by using the “free” grant options first, this should not be done at the expense<br />
of revenue-increasing re<strong>for</strong>ms or a clear analysis of the af<strong>for</strong>dability of environmental<br />
investments.<br />
Legal/institutional<br />
Decentralisation <strong>and</strong> institutional capacities<br />
All SEE countries have devolved significant environmental responsibilities to<br />
the local governments. The decentralisation process has been accomplished in all<br />
countries except <strong>for</strong> Serbia. In Albania, decentralisation is partly accomplished,<br />
having been completed in the water <strong>and</strong> waste sectors. In the process of decentralisation,<br />
SEE countries have transferred competencies <strong>for</strong> environmental services to<br />
the municipal level. In many cases, these are new responsibilities at the local government<br />
level, <strong>and</strong> the institutions have not managed to adjust their staff <strong>and</strong> capacities<br />
to properly manage the obligations. So far there has been no sufficient<br />
human <strong>and</strong> financial resource planning in connection with the newly acquired responsibilities<br />
in environment. The human resources capacity of local governments<br />
C H A P T E R 3<br />
C H A L L E N G E S T O E N V I R O N M E N TA L F I N A N C I N G I N S E E<br />
TYPE CONSTRAINTS DESCRIPTION ADDRESSED IN<br />
GREATER DETAIL IN<br />
Project Low capacity <strong>for</strong><br />
preparation project preparation<br />
Low level of project maturity Lack of feasibility studies prior to<br />
initiating the design phase; lack of<br />
EIAs; failure to take into account<br />
institutional <strong>and</strong> financial issues<br />
when planning environmental<br />
infrastructure<br />
S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 65