07.12.2012 Views

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 2: Key challenges <strong>and</strong> constraints at municipal level (continued)<br />

Inadequate capacity <strong>for</strong> financial, environmental<br />

<strong>and</strong> investment planning<br />

Many local governments lack the capacity to underst<strong>and</strong> environmental infrastructure<br />

investments in the context of a market economy, including issues of social<br />

af<strong>for</strong>dability, cost recovery, depreciation <strong>and</strong> the appropriate use of subsidies.<br />

They are reluctant to take on loans, either due to legal restrictions on debt servicing<br />

or insecurity about their repayment capacities stemming from inadequate financial<br />

management practices. They there<strong>for</strong>e prioritise investments that can be<br />

serviced by grants or inexpensive soft loans from the central government or <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

donors, rather than real needs driven by rational environmental <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

planning (REC, 2005). In the meantime, necessary but more expensive <strong>and</strong> complex<br />

investments are postponed; the environment <strong>and</strong> society are further degraded;<br />

<strong>and</strong> necessary institutional re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> popular awareness-raising programmes are<br />

not implemented. While not denying that local governments should optimise<br />

funding by using the “free” grant options first, this should not be done at the expense<br />

of revenue-increasing re<strong>for</strong>ms or a clear analysis of the af<strong>for</strong>dability of environmental<br />

investments.<br />

Legal/institutional<br />

Decentralisation <strong>and</strong> institutional capacities<br />

All SEE countries have devolved significant environmental responsibilities to<br />

the local governments. The decentralisation process has been accomplished in all<br />

countries except <strong>for</strong> Serbia. In Albania, decentralisation is partly accomplished,<br />

having been completed in the water <strong>and</strong> waste sectors. In the process of decentralisation,<br />

SEE countries have transferred competencies <strong>for</strong> environmental services to<br />

the municipal level. In many cases, these are new responsibilities at the local government<br />

level, <strong>and</strong> the institutions have not managed to adjust their staff <strong>and</strong> capacities<br />

to properly manage the obligations. So far there has been no sufficient<br />

human <strong>and</strong> financial resource planning in connection with the newly acquired responsibilities<br />

in environment. The human resources capacity of local governments<br />

C H A P T E R 3<br />

C H A L L E N G E S T O E N V I R O N M E N TA L F I N A N C I N G I N S E E<br />

TYPE CONSTRAINTS DESCRIPTION ADDRESSED IN<br />

GREATER DETAIL IN<br />

Project Low capacity <strong>for</strong><br />

preparation project preparation<br />

Low level of project maturity Lack of feasibility studies prior to<br />

initiating the design phase; lack of<br />

EIAs; failure to take into account<br />

institutional <strong>and</strong> financial issues<br />

when planning environmental<br />

infrastructure<br />

S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!