Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ... Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

07.12.2012 Views

of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive and the Large Combustion Plants (LCP) Directive. They are primarily the responsibility of the private sector or of individual state-owned companies and are not therefore a priority within the PEIP. References to other sectors are included only in order to provide a broader context. In this context, environmental infrastructure investment projects are understood as projects that require significant financial resources and time to complete. Examples include infrastructure for the provision of systems and services such as drinking water supply, sewage treatment or waste management leading to compliance with EU environmental directives. The publication gives priority to describing projects that have a regional (SEE) impact on the environment. Wherever generic comments are made on infrastructure development, they are of relevance to both urban and rural infrastructure development. Nevertheless, the focus of the analyses is on urban infrastructure development. Targeting the environmental investment challenge means addressing all stages of project cycle management. However, the present publication focuses on the early stages of project cycle management, such as programming and project preparation. The experience of the new EU member states illustrates how mistakes during the early stages of project cycle management can significantly reduce the chances of completing a project successfully. With this in mind, particular emphasis is given here to project cycle management up to the point at which funds are secured for project implementation. Later aspects of project cycle management are also mentioned but are not analysed in detail. Methodological approach Sources of information In drafting the present publication, the following main sources of information were used: • Related reports and publications on the situation in SEE and CEE. • Two regional surveys linked to the drafting of the PEIP water and waste manuals. The surveys were prepared by the PEIP team in summer 2008 (water) and spring 2009 (waste) and circulated to relevant ministry officials and national authorities in the water and waste sectors. The information was cross-checked against the available national strategic documents by the REC country offices in the SEE countries. • An additional survey carried out in all SEE countries in August 2009 for the present publication. Like the surveys carried out for the manuals, this survey was circulated to national authorities and the information provided was checked against national strategic documents in the relevant sectors. • Desk research on the experiences of new EU member states and candidate countries in relation to the preparation and implementation of infrastructure investment projects. I N T R O D U C T I O N S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 33

34 I N T R O D U C T I O N S T R AT E G I C M O V E S • Lessons learned from the REC’s work under the PEIP, including materials from analytical country reports, national workshops and regional meetings. • Lessons learned from the REC’s work on other key projects related to environmental investments and environmental institutions. Structure of the publication • In Chapter 1, the role played by the PEIP in the field of environmental infrastructure investments in SEE is described. During the past eight years, the PEIP has provided a framework for numerous activities in the region, and as such defines the structure of this publication. • The status of environmental infrastructure has a direct bearing on the size of the investment challenge. The analysis of this area in Chapter 2 indicates how far countries are from full implementation of respective directives. • The authors have identified key constraints and challenges to investments and have linked them with potential responses in Chapter 3. Challenges are divided between national and municipal, as they are quite different in nature. Political, economic, financial, legal, institutional, planning and project preparation challenges are also discussed. • In Chapter 4, the economic situation is analysed in order to define the wider framework for environmental investments. The state of the economy and of the national budget have a direct implication for all investments, including environmental infrastructure investments. Some of the main obstacles and benefits in the countries’ progress towards EU integration are outlined and the status of each country with respect to EU accession is presented. Investment-heavy directives are explicitly mentioned as they represent the legal basis and the main pressure for investments in environmental infrastructure. National environmental investment needs are presented in order to obtain an idea of the scope of the problem and to be able to compare the needs against the available funding from different sources. • The legal and strategic framework of the SEE countries is explored in Chapter 5 in order to gauge the speed of transposition and the completeness of the legal framework. This is an indication of the political will in the country as well as of the legal pressure to undertake reforms. Enforcement is a critical aspect that has very often been a stumbling block in countries that have made excellent progress in transposition. The legal pressure to carry out environmental infrastructure investments will be effective only if there is a high level of compliance through a robust enforcement system. National institutions are of key importance in carrying out environmental investments. An analysis of such institutions illustrates the extent to which one of the main bottlenecks to investments has been removed. • The status of utilities and of utility reforms is directly correlated to their readiness to attract investments in water and waste. This is even more important in times of economic crisis, as explained in Chapter 6.

34<br />

I N T R O D U C T I O N<br />

S T R AT E G I C M O V E S<br />

• Lessons learned from the REC’s work under the PEIP, including materials from<br />

analytical country reports, national workshops <strong>and</strong> regional meetings.<br />

• Lessons learned from the REC’s work on other key projects related to environmental<br />

investments <strong>and</strong> environmental institutions.<br />

Structure of the publication<br />

• In Chapter 1, the role played by the PEIP in the field of environmental infrastructure<br />

investments in SEE is described. During the past eight years, the PEIP<br />

has provided a framework <strong>for</strong> numerous activities in the region, <strong>and</strong> as such defines<br />

the structure of this publication.<br />

• The status of environmental infrastructure has a direct bearing on the size of the<br />

investment challenge. The analysis of this area in Chapter 2 indicates how far<br />

countries are from full implementation of respective directives.<br />

• The authors have identified key constraints <strong>and</strong> challenges to investments <strong>and</strong><br />

have linked them with potential responses in Chapter 3. Challenges are divided<br />

between national <strong>and</strong> municipal, as they are quite different in nature. Political,<br />

economic, financial, legal, institutional, planning <strong>and</strong> project preparation challenges<br />

are also discussed.<br />

• In Chapter 4, the economic situation is analysed in order to define the wider<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> environmental investments. The state of the economy <strong>and</strong> of<br />

the national budget have a direct implication <strong>for</strong> all investments, including environmental<br />

infrastructure investments. Some of the main obstacles <strong>and</strong> benefits<br />

in the countries’ progress towards EU integration are outlined <strong>and</strong> the status<br />

of each country with respect to EU accession is presented. Investment-heavy<br />

directives are explicitly mentioned as they represent the legal basis <strong>and</strong> the main<br />

pressure <strong>for</strong> investments in environmental infrastructure. National environmental<br />

investment needs are presented in order to obtain an idea of the scope<br />

of the problem <strong>and</strong> to be able to compare the needs against the available funding<br />

from different sources.<br />

• The legal <strong>and</strong> strategic framework of the SEE countries is explored in Chapter 5<br />

in order to gauge the speed of transposition <strong>and</strong> the completeness of the legal<br />

framework. This is an indication of the political will in the country as well as of<br />

the legal pressure to undertake re<strong>for</strong>ms. En<strong>for</strong>cement is a critical aspect that has<br />

very often been a stumbling block in countries that have made excellent progress<br />

in transposition. The legal pressure to carry out environmental infrastructure investments<br />

will be effective only if there is a high level of compliance through a<br />

robust en<strong>for</strong>cement system. National institutions are of key importance in carrying<br />

out environmental investments. An analysis of such institutions illustrates the<br />

extent to which one of the main bottlenecks to investments has been removed.<br />

• The status of utilities <strong>and</strong> of utility re<strong>for</strong>ms is directly correlated to their readiness<br />

to attract investments in water <strong>and</strong> waste. This is even more important in<br />

times of economic crisis, as explained in Chapter 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!