07.12.2012 Views

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOX 24: Upgrade <strong>and</strong> extension of the wastewater treatment plant in Subotica, Serbia<br />

of EUR 7.6 million. Three other projects advanced significantly. Technical assistance<br />

<strong>for</strong> water sector projects in 13 FBiH municipalities <strong>and</strong> technical assistance<br />

<strong>for</strong> water sector projects in 16 RS municipalities both secured conditional EIB<br />

loans (i.e. <strong>for</strong> those municipalities that can secure 50 percent from own funds).<br />

The project “Protection of the Drinking Water Reservoir <strong>for</strong> Tuzla Canton” secured<br />

an IPA grant <strong>and</strong> an EIB loan subject to 50 percent secured from own funds.<br />

In Croatia, total funds of EUR 164 million were secured <strong>for</strong> 12 projects, six of<br />

which secured sufficient funds to complete detailed project designs <strong>and</strong>/or commence<br />

with the construction phase (EUR 162.7 million). These six projects were<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e removed from the list. Four of the projects were from the waste sector<br />

<strong>and</strong> two from the water sector. At the same time, another six projects were removed<br />

from the PEIP lists as they were no longer considered as high-priority projects (following<br />

consolidation with the EPOP list discussed at the beginning of this chapter).<br />

The project <strong>for</strong> the waste management centre <strong>for</strong> Eastern Slavonia was<br />

dropped from the list as negotiations about <strong>for</strong>ming a regional utility company<br />

failed <strong>and</strong> the project came to a st<strong>and</strong>still. The projects secured funding from different<br />

sources. Projects previously on the list secured the remainder of funding in<br />

the <strong>for</strong>m of grants from Phare <strong>and</strong> CARDS, as well as various national <strong>and</strong> own<br />

funds (e.g. through Croatian Waters, the EPEEF, municipal budgets, <strong>and</strong> publicprivate<br />

partnerships) supplemented by loans (mainly from the EBRD). Six projects<br />

entered the IPA pipeline in the 2007–2009 period, three of which were approved<br />

(by September 2009) <strong>for</strong> regional/county waste management centres <strong>for</strong> Zadar<br />

county, <strong>for</strong> the Istria region, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> Sisacko-Moslovacka county.<br />

C H A P T E R 8<br />

P R I O R I T I S AT I O N O F I N F R A S T R U C T U R E P R O J E C T S — T H E P E I P L I S T S<br />

The upgrading <strong>and</strong> extension of the wastewater treatment plant will have significant regional benefits. Project implementation<br />

will significantly improve the ecological status of Lake Palic <strong>and</strong> that of Lake Ludos <strong>and</strong> the Tisa River,<br />

which receive waters from Lake Palic. The project will contribute to the prevention of groundwater pollution <strong>and</strong><br />

to the improvement of cleaning technology with de-nitrification <strong>and</strong> de-phosphorisation.<br />

Financial setup:<br />

The total cost of the project is EUR 18.6 million. The project secured total funding through the following financial<br />

setup:<br />

• Own sources: EUR 3.9 million provided by the municipality of Subotica<br />

• Grants: EUR 5,670,159 provided by the European Agency <strong>for</strong> Reconstruction <strong>and</strong> the EBRD<br />

• Loans: EUR 9 million provided by the EBRD with subsidised interest<br />

Success factors:<br />

Good project documentation was provided, including financial <strong>and</strong> management plans. The PUC was managed<br />

properly <strong>and</strong> its project preparation capability was developed. A tariff policy <strong>and</strong> plan was developed, envisaging<br />

a gradual increase in tariffs.<br />

S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!