Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

FIGURE 28: Number of projects showing major and minor progress between 2007 and 2009
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Albania Bosnia and
Herzegovina
sectors equally. The reason lies in the fact that a high number of hotspot remediation
projects (belonging to the waste sector) were removed in this period, and many
municipal landfill projects were replaced by a smaller number of regional landfill
projects, while the water sector is lagging behind in terms of regionalisation.
Figure 27 illustrates that the highest “turnover” of projects was in Croatia. This
is due to the fact that the EPOP for the 2007–2009 period was adopted in 2007
and included two lists, one with 14 water sector projects and the second with 12
waste sector projects. In consultation with the Croatian Ministry of Environmental
Protection, Physical Planning and Construction it was decided to consolidate
the PEIP lists with the EPOP list. As a result, the PEIP lists now contain all the
projects on the EPOP list, as well as three additional projects on hazardous waste
remediation.
The highest number of additions was made in Serbia, followed by Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Croatia. Bosnia and Herzegovina added almost exclusively water
sector projects to the lists, while the additions were relatively balanced in Croatia
and Serbia. There were slightly more additions in the water sector, due to the
progress made in the waste sector in terms of regionalisation resulting in mergers
of a number of waste projects.
C H A P T E R 8
P R I O R I T I S AT I O N O F I N F R A S T R U C T U R E P R O J E C T S — T H E P E I P L I S T S
Some progress Significant funding secured therefore removed from lists
Source: REC national PEIP lists
Croatia FYR
Macedonia
Kosovo (under
UNSCR 1244)
Montenegro
Serbia
S T R AT E G I C M O V E S 193