07.12.2012 Views

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

Strategic Moves - Regional Environmental Center for Central and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192<br />

C H A P T E R 8<br />

P R I O R I T I S AT I O N O F I N F R A S T R U C T U R E P R O J E C T S — T H E P E I P L I S T S<br />

FIGURE 27: Projects added to <strong>and</strong> removed from the national PEIP lists between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

S T R AT E G I C M O V E S<br />

Albania Bosnia <strong>and</strong><br />

Herzegovina<br />

Removed Added<br />

Source: REC national PEIP lists<br />

Croatia FYR<br />

Macedonia<br />

Kosovo (under<br />

UNSCR 1244)<br />

Montenegro<br />

Serbia<br />

merged due to new regional concepts; <strong>and</strong> a relatively high number of projects were<br />

removed as not feasible. Two projects secured funding <strong>for</strong> implementation <strong>and</strong><br />

were there<strong>for</strong>e removed from the list. Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina <strong>and</strong> Serbia show<br />

the highest net increase in the number of projects on the lists due to the fact that,<br />

in this period, the respective governmental units increased their activities in the<br />

area of technical assistance <strong>for</strong> the preparation of project documentation <strong>and</strong> prefeasibility<br />

studies <strong>for</strong> water sector projects. In the case of Croatia, the number of<br />

projects remained constant. A large number of projects were added, while an<br />

equally large number of projects were removed due to the streamlining of projects<br />

according to the Croatian <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Operational Programme<br />

(EPOP 2007–2009). In Serbia, many projects were added but very few were removed<br />

in the 2007–2009 period.<br />

Figure 26 illustrates how the air sector, which was already less significant in <strong>and</strong><br />

prior to 2007, had almost completely disappeared from the priority lists by 2009.<br />

The role of air sector projects is discussed above.<br />

The highest net increase in the number of projects between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2009 is<br />

in the water sector. However, this does not imply that water has a higher priority<br />

than waste. All countries in the region are striving to achieve compliance in both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!