Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
data showing the ability of lapatinib to reverse hormone resistance and to cooperate with<br />
tamoxifen in providing maximal growth arrest provide the rationale for this study (162).<br />
It will be important in all of the trials mentioned in Table 2 and similar other studies, to<br />
stratify for prior endocrine therapy (usually tamoxifen) given in the adjuvant setting, and,<br />
in particular, the interval since completion of such therapy. This is important, as it may<br />
have implications for the presence or absence of activated growth factor signaling in the<br />
relapsed tumor, which could determine the efficacy of added gefitinib or lapatinib. In<br />
addition, biologic studies are required to help predict those patients who are more likely<br />
to benefit from combined endocrine/antiH<strong>ER</strong> therapy. For example, the<br />
tamoxifen/gefitinib trial (Table 2) will undertake studies to look at downstream<br />
intracellular signaling components of the H<strong>ER</strong> family, in addition to assessment of <strong>ER</strong><br />
and <strong>ER</strong> co-activators such as AIB1.<br />
V. Future challenges<br />
As the complexity of <strong>ER</strong> biology is being revealed, so is the complexity of the<br />
mechanisms responsible for endocrine sensitivity and resistance in breast cancer. The<br />
genomic and the non-genomic activities of <strong>ER</strong>, as well as their complex interplay with<br />
many other growth factors and cellular kinase pathways, influence tumor sensitivity to<br />
various types of endocrine therapies. Although <strong>ER</strong> was first identified more than 30<br />
years ago, we are still trying to clarify and understand its multiple roles in normal<br />
physiology and in disease. In breast cancer there is convincing evidence that <strong>ER</strong> does not<br />
34