Enhancing India’s Readiness to Climate Finance
India has taken several steps to improve its national response to climate change. India’s climate finance requirements, however, are very high, and will need to be met through a combination of public, private and international climate finance. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/
India has taken several steps to improve its national response to climate change. India’s climate finance requirements, however, are very high, and will need to be met through a combination of public, private and international climate finance. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/
Enhancing India’s readiness to access and deliver international climate finance Figure 3.3: Current total public climate finance, is underweight in India and overweight in Latin America, when compared to future mitigation and adaptation finance needs Source: Buchner et al. (2012), IEA (2012), World Bank (2010), Vivid Economics. 31 3.4 India’s climate finance performance: High-level trends The analysis in the previous section shows that India is already attracting climate finance that can help the country meet its sustainable development goals – although likely not at the level needed to fully implement the country’s main climate change strategy. In sum, the main messages that come out of this analysis are: India has developed a comprehensive national climate change policy – the NAPCC – which addresses eight priorities for sustainable development with climate change cobenefits. The NAPCC is not backed by a coordinated financing strategy – although estimates of the cost to implement the Plan are at least $38 billion. Since 2003, India has accessed $554 million from multilateral climate funds, with the CTF and GEF being the two most important sources. In 2012 India received nearly $928 million in bilateral climate finance for mitigation and adaptation, excluding funding from Japan. 76% of this financing came from Germany. For both bilateral and multilateral climate finance, delays on disbursement and project implementation remain a barrier that needs to be overcome in India. India was the second largest recipient of CDM investment, behind China, although CDM financing has begun to dry-up and cannot be expected to play a major role in the future. Renewable energy projects are the main destination for private sector climate finance investment, comprising 77% of total CDM funding. Strong government action under the 31 Vivid Economics (2014), Delivery vehicle options for the International Climate Fund, report prepared for ICF spending departments. Ref: Ricardo-AEA/R/ED59216/Final Report 17
Enhancing India’s readiness to access and deliver international climate finance NAPCC will need to be taken to channel investment into other priority sectors in India, such as energy efficiency. Estimates on India’s total annual climate finance flows are likely to be much higher than the cumulative value of multilateral, bilateral and CDM funding outlined in this report, as additional sources of private finance, multilateral climate finance not channelled through dedicated climate funds, and donors like Japan are added to the calculation. India’s track record in accessing climate finance is strong in absolute terms compared to peer countries like Brazil, China, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa & Thailand. Existing climate finance volumes are nevertheless insufficient to meet the $38billion funding goal necessary to implement the NAPCC, and will need to be supplemented with government revenues, private investment, and further international climate finance. Ref: Ricardo-AEA/R/ED59216/Final Report 18
- Page 1 and 2: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 3 and 4: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 5 and 6: Acknowledgements Enhancing India’
- Page 7 and 8: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 9 and 10: STRENGTHS Enhancing India’s readi
- Page 11 and 12: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 13 and 14: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 15 and 16: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 17 and 18: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 19 and 20: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 21 and 22: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 23 and 24: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 25 and 26: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 27 and 28: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 29 and 30: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 31 and 32: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 33 and 34: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 35: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 39 and 40: 4.2 Readiness Framework overview En
- Page 41 and 42: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 43 and 44: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 45 and 46: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 47 and 48: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 49 and 50: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 51 and 52: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 53 and 54: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 55 and 56: 5.5.2 Detailed scoring of Tier 1 in
- Page 57 and 58: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 59 and 60: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 61 and 62: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 63 and 64: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 65 and 66: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 67 and 68: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 69 and 70: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 71 and 72: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 73 and 74: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 75 and 76: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 77 and 78: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 79 and 80: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 81 and 82: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 83 and 84: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
- Page 85 and 86: Enhancing India’s readiness to ac
<strong>Enhancing</strong> <strong>India’s</strong> readiness <strong>to</strong> access and deliver international climate finance<br />
<br />
<br />
NAPCC will need <strong>to</strong> be taken <strong>to</strong> channel investment in<strong>to</strong> other priority sec<strong>to</strong>rs in India, such<br />
as energy efficiency.<br />
Estimates on <strong>India’s</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal annual climate finance flows are likely <strong>to</strong> be much higher<br />
than the cumulative value of multilateral, bilateral and CDM funding outlined in this<br />
report, as additional sources of private finance, multilateral climate finance not channelled<br />
through dedicated climate funds, and donors like Japan are added <strong>to</strong> the calculation.<br />
<strong>India’s</strong> track record in accessing climate finance is strong in absolute terms compared<br />
<strong>to</strong> peer countries like Brazil, China, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa & Thailand.<br />
<br />
Existing climate finance volumes are nevertheless insufficient <strong>to</strong> meet the<br />
$38billion funding goal necessary <strong>to</strong> implement the NAPCC, and will need <strong>to</strong> be<br />
supplemented with government revenues, private investment, and further international<br />
climate finance.<br />
Ref: Ricardo-AEA/R/ED59216/Final Report<br />
18