11.02.2016 Views

Babasaheb Dr B.R Ambedkar

Volume_05

Volume_05

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

z:\ ambedkar\vol-05\vol5-04.indd MK SJ+YS 23-9-2013/YS-10-11-2013 242<br />

242 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES<br />

before 1932 did not care to quarrel over the question of the population<br />

of the Untouchables, after 1932 began denying the very existence of such<br />

a class as Untouchables.<br />

The ostensible grounds urged by the Hindus before the Lothian<br />

Committee for reducing the population of the Untouchables were two.<br />

One was that the figures given by the Census Commissioner were for<br />

Depressed Classes and not for Untouchables and that Depressed Classes<br />

included other classes besides Untouchables. The second ground urged by<br />

them was that, the definition of the word should be uniform throughout<br />

all India and should be applied in all Provinces in determining the<br />

population of the Untouchables. In other words they objected to a local<br />

test of untouchability.<br />

The first contention was absolutely untrue. The term Depressed<br />

Classes was used as a synonym for Untouchables and the term Depressed<br />

Classes was used instead of the term Untouchables because the latter,<br />

it was felt, would give offence to the people meant to be included under<br />

the term. That, it was used to denote only the Untouchables and it did<br />

not include the Aboriginals or the Criminal Tribes was made clear in<br />

the debate that took place in the Imperial Legislative Council in 1916<br />

on the Resolution moved by the Honourable Mr. Dadabhoy. The second<br />

contention of the caste Hindus was that the test of untouchability should<br />

be uniform. The object of putting forth this contention was to reduce the<br />

number of Untouchables. It is well known that there are variations in<br />

the forms which untouchability assumes in different parts of India. In<br />

some parts of India, Untouchables are unseeables i.e. they cause pollution<br />

if they come within the sight of a Touchable Hindu. In some parts<br />

Untouchables are unapproachables i.e. they cause pollution if they come<br />

within a certain distance of a Touchable Hindu. Of these unapproachables<br />

there are two classes. There is a class of unapproachables who cannot<br />

come within a certain fixed distance of a Touchable Hindu. There is<br />

another class of unapproachables who cannot come so near a Hindu as<br />

to let his shadow fall upon him. In some parts of India an Untouchable<br />

is not an unseeable or unapproachable. It is only his physical contact<br />

which causes pollution. In some parts an Untouchable is one who is not<br />

allowed to touch water or food. In some parts an Untouchable is one<br />

who is not allowed to enter a temple. With these variations it is clear,<br />

that if unseeability was taken as the only test of untouchability, then<br />

the unapproachables would have to be excluded from the category of<br />

Untouchables. If unapproachability was taken as a test, then those whose<br />

touch only caused pollution will have to be excluded from the category of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!