24.01.2016 Views

Centrifugal Pumps Design and Application 2nd ed - Val S. Lobanoff, Robert R. Ross (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Failure Analysis<br />

Mechanical Seal Reliability 557<br />

The purpose of a mechanical seal is to prevent, or at least limit, leakage.<br />

Normally, the leakage from a mechanical seal is so slight that it is<br />

difficult to measure. For example, a 2-inch seal containing water at 100<br />

psig should leak less than 2 ml/hr. Current f<strong>ed</strong>eral regulations require<br />

that the concentration of certain volatile organics be less than 10,000<br />

ppm near the seal leakage point. In some areas, this limit is 1000 ppm. It<br />

is likely that none of these examples would show any visible leakage. Because<br />

most seals are wearing devices, they will fail, that is, leak excessively<br />

t at some point in time. The machinery engineer must therefore be<br />

prepar<strong>ed</strong> to learn from each seal failure <strong>and</strong> use that information to improve<br />

future designs <strong>and</strong> applications so that seal life is improv<strong>ed</strong>. In order<br />

to do this, detail<strong>ed</strong> records of each failure should be maintain<strong>ed</strong>.<br />

Failure analysis is simply allowing the seal to tell why it did not perform<br />

as expect<strong>ed</strong>. This means acting the part of a detective. The following<br />

simple guidelines will make failure analysis easier <strong>and</strong> more consistent:<br />

• Know what a new seal looks like.<br />

» Know what a successfully appli<strong>ed</strong> seal looks like.<br />

» Examine the fail<strong>ed</strong> seal carefully.<br />

• Write down the differences between the new, successful, <strong>and</strong> fail<strong>ed</strong><br />

seals.<br />

• Formulate a consistent explanation about the differences.<br />

Although manufacturers <strong>and</strong> mechanics are familiar with new seals,<br />

sometimes a machinery engineer may not see the unus<strong>ed</strong> item. He only<br />

sees the failures. Similarly, he may not see many successfully appli<strong>ed</strong><br />

seals because they are not call<strong>ed</strong> to his attention. He is too busy looking<br />

at failures. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, some failure modes are so common that a<br />

mechanic may come to accept them as "normal wear." For failure analysis<br />

to be useM, all differences in the new <strong>and</strong> fail<strong>ed</strong> seal should be not<strong>ed</strong>.<br />

These differences must be written down in a consistent format. The<br />

form shown as Table 21-1 is a good starting point <strong>and</strong> can be modifi<strong>ed</strong> to<br />

suit particular ne<strong>ed</strong>s. There is a great temptation to take mental notes <strong>and</strong><br />

write them later. This temptation must be overcome, <strong>and</strong> written notes<br />

must be made while examining the seal. If these notes become soil<strong>ed</strong>,<br />

they can be rewritten later.<br />

For many refineries <strong>and</strong> chemical plants, the statistics in Table 21-2<br />

have been develop<strong>ed</strong> from analysis of many pump seal failures.<br />

Statistics show that most seals fail prematurely, that is, prior to wearing<br />

out. They also show that these early failures can be prevent<strong>ed</strong> by sim-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!