24.01.2016 Views

Centrifugal Pumps Design and Application 2nd ed - Val S. Lobanoff, Robert R. Ross (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 <strong>Centrifugal</strong> <strong>Pumps</strong>: <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Application</strong><br />

Example of Pipeline Pump Selection<br />

As describ<strong>ed</strong> earlier, pipeline pumps must be capable of adapting to<br />

change in pipeline throughput. The following exercise illustrates the<br />

pump selection process for a crude oil pipeline, where condition changes<br />

necessitate impeller changeouts, destaging, <strong>and</strong> volute chipping.<br />

<strong>Pumps</strong> are requir<strong>ed</strong> to transport crude oil from a developing oil field<br />

through a trunk line to a tank farm 120 miles away. Routing, pipe size,<br />

<strong>and</strong> pipe rating have been determin<strong>ed</strong>. A profile with hydraulic gradients<br />

<strong>and</strong> typical system curves has been develop<strong>ed</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the field is expect<strong>ed</strong><br />

to produce 15,000 to 30,000 BPD (Figures 10-23 <strong>and</strong> 10-24). Note Milepost<br />

085 (Figure 10-23) becomes a "control point." At least 1,200-ft station<br />

head is ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong> to overcome the elevation <strong>and</strong> to insure 50 psi positive<br />

pressure at this high point. The project<strong>ed</strong> future rate is 35,000 BPD,,<br />

resulting in the following pipeline design conditions:<br />

Initial<br />

J^iHH<br />

Capacity (BPD) 15,000-30,000 35,000<br />

Capacity (GPM) 437-875 1,021<br />

Differential head (ft) 1,800-3,700 4,650<br />

Differential head (psi) 694-1,246 1,792<br />

A booster pump has been siz<strong>ed</strong> to provide adequate NPSH to the mainline<br />

pumps. In this example, the head develop<strong>ed</strong> by the booster pump will be<br />

disregard<strong>ed</strong>.<br />

First consideration is the "future" condition. With 0.89 specific gravity<br />

<strong>and</strong> an estimat<strong>ed</strong> 76% pump efficiency, the total brake horsepower<br />

requir<strong>ed</strong> is approximately 1,400. The most economical energy source is a<br />

local electric company. Starting current restrictions at the station site<br />

limit motor horsepower size. To satisfy this restriction <strong>and</strong> to gain flexibility<br />

of operation as well as partial capacity with one pump out of service,<br />

two pumps driven by 700 HP motors operating in series are preferr<strong>ed</strong>.<br />

The ratings for each pump to meet future conditions, will then be<br />

1,021 GPM at 2,325 ft.<br />

A good selection would be a 4-in. pump with 5 stages <strong>and</strong> 10 3 /8-in.<br />

diameter impellers (pattern 2008-H), for 465 ft per stage (Figure 10-25).<br />

With 80% efficiency, the brake horsepower is 667. Performance curves<br />

for single-pump operation <strong>and</strong> two pumps in series are plott<strong>ed</strong> against the<br />

system head curves (Figure 10-26). Operating points will be at intersections<br />

of pump curves <strong>and</strong> system curves. Lower capacities will require<br />

throttling at the station discharge control valve, which, in effect,<br />

produces a steeper system head curve. In this example, when flow is r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong><br />

to 885 GPM, the differential head develop<strong>ed</strong> by two pumps is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!