24.01.2016 Views

Centrifugal Pumps Design and Application 2nd ed - Val S. Lobanoff, Robert R. Ross (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

94 <strong>Centrifugal</strong> <strong>Pumps</strong>: <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Application</strong><br />

Both the friction losses <strong>and</strong> the acceleration losses are proportional to<br />

the square of the liquid velocity as it approaches the impeller eye with a<br />

constant of proportionality designat<strong>ed</strong> by Kj. The losses due to blade entry<br />

are proportional to the square of the velocity of flow relative to the<br />

blade leading <strong>ed</strong>ge with a constant of proportionality designat<strong>ed</strong> by K 2 .<br />

To prevent cavitation, these losses must be compensat<strong>ed</strong> by supplying adequate<br />

NPSH to the pump. This "cavitation-free" NPSHR can then be<br />

express<strong>ed</strong> as:<br />

where the first term, K}C M i 2 /2g, represents the friction <strong>and</strong> acceleration<br />

losses, <strong>and</strong> the second term, K/zW 2 /2g, represents the blade entry losses,<br />

From this, it can be seen that, in small pumps of low spe<strong>ed</strong>, the first term<br />

is pr<strong>ed</strong>ominant, while for large <strong>and</strong>/or high spe<strong>ed</strong> pumps, the second<br />

term is the controlling factor <strong>and</strong> the first term is of secondary importance.<br />

This explains why it is often possible to r<strong>ed</strong>uce NPSHR on moderate<br />

spe<strong>ed</strong> pumps by changing to a larger eye impeller. As cavitation is<br />

most likely to occur in the region where the relative velocity, w, is highest,<br />

the calculation is bas<strong>ed</strong> only on the maximum diameter of the blade<br />

tip, D,, at the impeller entry.<br />

The incidence angle, a, that influences Ka is the difference between the<br />

inlet blade angle, Bj, <strong>and</strong> the flow angle, 0 (Figure 8-9). Bj is determin<strong>ed</strong><br />

from CMI multipli<strong>ed</strong> by factor Rj, which allows for the effects of<br />

recirculat<strong>ed</strong> flow, Q L , <strong>and</strong> nonuniform velocity distribution. As the leakage,<br />

Q L , does not remain constant due to internal erosion, <strong>and</strong> as many<br />

engineers differ in their selection of RI, it is seldom if ever that a equals<br />

zero. Leakage QL through impeller wear ring clearances <strong>and</strong> balance<br />

Figure 8-9. Blade <strong>and</strong> flow angle at impeller inlet.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!