JANUARY
1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6
1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INDIA<br />
are provided by other ministries and departments to their personnel (e.g., defense, railways, ports, mines, and<br />
employee state insurance schemes).<br />
Each state has its own State Directorate of Health Services and State Department of Health and Family Welfare,<br />
which is responsible for providing care to its population. District-level health services provide a link between<br />
each state and primary care services.<br />
Other agencies involved in health system governance include the Insurance Regulatory and Development<br />
Authority, which regulates the health insurance industry, and the National eHealth Authority, which is to become<br />
the nodal authority for development of an integrated health information system (MOH, 2015b). There is<br />
confusion in India with respect to which entities are responsible for regulating the private sector and for<br />
ensuring quality of care, as there are multiple agencies under different ministries, with no single responsible<br />
agency. For example, the Bureau of Indian Standards and Consumer Protection Act are under the Ministry<br />
of Consumer Affairs, whereas the Quality Council of India is under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.<br />
An attempt is being made to bring these agencies under one authority.<br />
What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care?<br />
Over the years, several regulations have been enacted and authorities created at the state and national level<br />
with the aim of protecting patients and improving quality of care. For example, at the state level, the Nursing<br />
Home Act and State Drug Controllers ensure quality of care provided by the private sector. A major impetus to<br />
establishing patient rights was the inclusion of private medical practice under the Consumer Protection Act in<br />
1986 (Balarajan et al. 2011). To ensure quality of care and define standards for health facilities, a number of laws<br />
were introduced, including those creating a national accreditation system, the National Accreditation Board for<br />
Hospitals (NABH, 2006; Gyani, 2015), and the Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS, 1997) for primary and<br />
secondary health care services. In addition, many hospitals undergo accreditation and certification from<br />
international bodies such as the Joint Commission International (JCI) and the International Organization for<br />
Standardization (Wennerholm et al. 2013).<br />
The Health Management Information System was launched in 2008 to monitor health programs and provide key<br />
inputs for monitoring and policy formulation. Currently, about 633 of 667 districts report data by facility (MOH,<br />
2015a). Large-scale surveys like the National Family Health Survey, the District-Level Household Survey, and the<br />
Annual Health Survey are periodically undertaken at the district, state, and national levels. In addition, the<br />
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) maintains disease registries for cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular<br />
diseases, and other illnesses.<br />
The 2010 Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act calls for prescribing minimum standards for<br />
all public and private clinical establishments in the country (MOH, 2012; MOH, 2015c). The act has already<br />
come into force in certain states (e.g., Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Sikkim) and in all<br />
union territories (CBHI, 2013). In addition, facilities shall charge rates as determined by central government in<br />
consultation with the state. The act stipulates fines and penalties if provisions are breached by any facility.<br />
A national council for clinical establishment will oversee implementation and compliance at the national level.<br />
Similar councils at the state and district levels will be established to enforce compliance locally (MOH, 2015c).<br />
Currently, a shift to one comprehensive approach of quality assurance is envisaged to replace the existing<br />
fragmented approach. For public health care facilities, the strategy would ensure that every facility is measured<br />
and scored for quality, and certified and incentivized when it achieves a certain minimum score. Quality<br />
measures would include clinical quality as well as patient safety, comfort, and satisfaction. In the private sector,<br />
voluntary accreditation with certificates like that of National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and National<br />
Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories would predominate. For private facilities that are<br />
part of a public–private partnership, quality certification would be mandatory either through those boards<br />
or through the public system (MOH, 2014).<br />
82<br />
The Commonwealth Fund