JANUARY

1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6 1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6

23.01.2016 Views

CANADA funding to 145 not-for-profit hospital corporations (with 224 different facilities and sites) and six private for-profit hospitals (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 2014). Hospitals in Canada generally operate under annual global budgets, negotiated with the provincial or territorial ministry of health or regional health authority. However, several provinces have considered introducing activitybased funding for hospitals, including Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia (Sutherland et al., 2013, 2013a). Hospital-based physicians generally are not hospital employees and are paid fee-for-service directly. Mental health care: There is universal coverage for physician-provided mental health care, alongside a fragmented system of allied services. Hospital mental health care is provided in specialty psychiatric hospitals and in general hospitals with adult mental health beds. The provinces and territories all provide a range of community mental health and addiction services including case management, community-based crisis response, and supported housing (Goering et al., 2000). Psychologists may work privately and are paid out-of-pocket or through private insurance, or under salary in publicly funded organizations. Mental health has not been formally integrated into primary care; any coordination or colocation of mental health services within primary care is unique to its particular practice. In Ontario, the government introduced an intersectoral mental health strategy in 2011 that aims to better integrate mental health care into primary care (Government of Ontario, 2011). Long-term care and social supports: Long-term care and end-of-life care provided in nonhospital facilities and in the community are not considered insured services under the Canada Health Act. All provinces and territories fund services, but coverage varies among and within them. All provinces provide some nursing home care and some combination of case management and nursing care for home care clients, but there is considerable variation when it comes to other services, including medical equipment, supplies, and home support, and many jurisdictions require client contributions (OECD, 2011). About half of the provinces and territories provide some home care without means-testing, but access may depend both on assessed priority and on availability within capped budgets (Health Canada, 2013b). Eligibility criteria for home and institutional long-term care services vary across provinces but generally include a needs assessment based on health status and functional impairment. Some provinces have established minimum residency periods as an eligibility condition for facility admission. Spending on nonhospital institutions, of which the majority are long-term care facilities, accounted for just over 10 percent of total health expenditure in 2013, with financing mostly from public sources (71%) (Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2015a). A mix of private for-profit (41%), private not-for-profit (43%), and public facilities (13%) provide long-term care (Statistics Canada, 2011). Public funding of home care is provided either through provincial or territorial government contracts with agencies that deliver services (e.g., the Community Care Access Centres, in Ontario) or through government stipends to patients to purchase their own services (e.g., the “Choice in Support for Independent Living” program in British Columbia). Provinces and territories are responsible for delivering palliative and end-of-life care in hospitals, where the majority of such costs occur. But many provide some coverage for services outside those settings, such as doctors, nurses, and drug coverage in hospices, in nursing facilities, and at home. Support for informal caregivers (estimated to provide 66% to 84% of care to the elderly) varies by province and territory (Grignon and Bernier, 2012). In Ontario, for example, the Family Caregiver Leave Bill offers job protection to caregivers. There are also some federal programs, including the Family Caregiver Tax Credit and the Employment Insurance Compassionate Care Benefit (Canada Revenue Agency, 2014; Government of Canada, 2014). 24 The Commonwealth Fund

What are the key entities for health system governance? CANADA Because of the high level of decentralization, provinces have primary jurisdiction over administration and governance of their health systems. The federal ministry of health, Health Canada, plays a role in promoting overall health, disease surveillance and control, food and drug safety, and medical device and technology review. The Public Health Agency of Canada is responsible for public health, emergency preparedness and response, and infectious and chronic disease control and prevention. At the national level, several intergovernmental nonprofit organizations aim to improve governance by monitoring and reporting on health system performance; disseminating best practice in patient safety (the Canadian Patient Safety Institute); providing information to the public on health and health care and standardizing health data collection (the Canadian Institute for Health Information); and providing funding and support for provincial health information systems (Canada Health Infoway). The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health oversees the national health technology assessment process, which produces information about the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and broader impact of drugs, medical technologies, and health systems. The Agency’s Common Drug Review reviews the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of drugs and provides common, nonbinding formulary recommendations to the publicly funded provincial drug plans (except in Quebec) to support greater consistency in access and evidence-based resource allocation. Nongovernmental organizations with important roles in system governance include professional organizations such as the Canadian Medical Association, provincial regulatory colleges, which are responsible for licensing professions and developing and enforcing standards of practice, and Accreditation Canada (see below). Most providers are self-governing under provincial and territorial law; they are registered with professional associations that ensure that education, training, and quality-of-care standards are met. The professional associations for physicians are also responsible for negotiating fee schedules with the provincial ministries of health. Most provinces have an ombudsperson providing patient advocacy. What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care? Since 2014, there have been no new national strategies initiated to ensure quality of care, although in the previous decade the Canada Health Accord provided for dedicated federal funding to provinces to achieve common goals in wait times, primary care, and home care. Some provinces have agencies responsible for producing health care system reports and for monitoring system performance, and many quality improvement initiatives take place at the provincial and territorial level. Examples include the Saskatchewan Health Quality Council, Health Quality Ontario, the British Columbia Patient Safety & Quality Council, and the New Brunswick Health Council. The use of financial incentives to improve quality is limited. For example, since 2010, Ontario hospitals have been required to develop and report quality improvement plans, and executive compensation has been linked to the achievement of targets set out in these plans (Government of Ontario, 2010). The federally funded Canadian Patient Safety Institute promotes best practices and develops strategies, standards, and tools. The Optimal Use Projects program, operated by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, provides recommendations (though not formal clinical guidelines) to providers and consumers in order to encourage the appropriate prescribing, purchasing, and use of medications. The Canadian Institute for Health Information produces regular reports on health system performance. There is no system of professional revalidation for physicians in Canada, but each province has its own process of ensuring that physicians engage in lifelong learning, such as a requirement that they participate in a continuing education program, and undergo peer review. There is no information available on doctors’ performance. Accreditation Canada—a not-for-profit organization—provides voluntary accreditation services to about 1,200 health care organizations across Canada, including regional health authorities, hospitals, long-term care facilities, and community organizations. International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2015 25

What are the key entities for health system governance?<br />

CANADA<br />

Because of the high level of decentralization, provinces have primary jurisdiction over administration and<br />

governance of their health systems. The federal ministry of health, Health Canada, plays a role in promoting<br />

overall health, disease surveillance and control, food and drug safety, and medical device and technology<br />

review. The Public Health Agency of Canada is responsible for public health, emergency preparedness and<br />

response, and infectious and chronic disease control and prevention.<br />

At the national level, several intergovernmental nonprofit organizations aim to improve governance by<br />

monitoring and reporting on health system performance; disseminating best practice in patient safety (the<br />

Canadian Patient Safety Institute); providing information to the public on health and health care and<br />

standardizing health data collection (the Canadian Institute for Health Information); and providing funding and<br />

support for provincial health information systems (Canada Health Infoway). The Canadian Agency for Drugs and<br />

Technologies in Health oversees the national health technology assessment process, which produces<br />

information about the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and broader impact of drugs, medical<br />

technologies, and health systems. The Agency’s Common Drug Review reviews the clinical effectiveness and<br />

cost-effectiveness of drugs and provides common, nonbinding formulary recommendations to the publicly<br />

funded provincial drug plans (except in Quebec) to support greater consistency in access and evidence-based<br />

resource allocation.<br />

Nongovernmental organizations with important roles in system governance include professional organizations<br />

such as the Canadian Medical Association, provincial regulatory colleges, which are responsible for licensing<br />

professions and developing and enforcing standards of practice, and Accreditation Canada (see below). Most<br />

providers are self-governing under provincial and territorial law; they are registered with professional<br />

associations that ensure that education, training, and quality-of-care standards are met. The professional<br />

associations for physicians are also responsible for negotiating fee schedules with the provincial ministries of<br />

health. Most provinces have an ombudsperson providing patient advocacy.<br />

What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care?<br />

Since 2014, there have been no new national strategies initiated to ensure quality of care, although in the<br />

previous decade the Canada Health Accord provided for dedicated federal funding to provinces to achieve<br />

common goals in wait times, primary care, and home care. Some provinces have agencies responsible for<br />

producing health care system reports and for monitoring system performance, and many quality improvement<br />

initiatives take place at the provincial and territorial level. Examples include the Saskatchewan Health Quality<br />

Council, Health Quality Ontario, the British Columbia Patient Safety & Quality Council, and the New Brunswick<br />

Health Council.<br />

The use of financial incentives to improve quality is limited. For example, since 2010, Ontario hospitals have<br />

been required to develop and report quality improvement plans, and executive compensation has been linked<br />

to the achievement of targets set out in these plans (Government of Ontario, 2010).<br />

The federally funded Canadian Patient Safety Institute promotes best practices and develops strategies,<br />

standards, and tools. The Optimal Use Projects program, operated by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and<br />

Technologies in Health, provides recommendations (though not formal clinical guidelines) to providers and<br />

consumers in order to encourage the appropriate prescribing, purchasing, and use of medications. The<br />

Canadian Institute for Health Information produces regular reports on health system performance.<br />

There is no system of professional revalidation for physicians in Canada, but each province has its own process<br />

of ensuring that physicians engage in lifelong learning, such as a requirement that they participate in a<br />

continuing education program, and undergo peer review. There is no information available on doctors’<br />

performance. Accreditation Canada—a not-for-profit organization—provides voluntary accreditation services to<br />

about 1,200 health care organizations across Canada, including regional health authorities, hospitals, long-term<br />

care facilities, and community organizations.<br />

International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2015 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!