JANUARY
1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6
1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UNITED STATES<br />
The Institute of Medicine (IOM), an independent nonprofit organization that works outside of government, acts<br />
as an adviser to policymakers and the private sector on improving the nation’s health. Stakeholder associations<br />
(e.g., the American Medical Association) comment on and lobby for policies affecting the health system.<br />
The independent, nonprofit Joint Commission accredits more than 20,000 health care organizations across the<br />
country, primarily hospitals, long-term care facilities, and laboratories, using criteria that include patient<br />
treatment, governance, culture, performance, and quality improvement. The National Committee for Quality<br />
Assurance, the primary accreditor of private health plans, is responsible for accrediting the plans participating<br />
in the newly created health insurance marketplaces. The nonprofit National Quality Forum builds consensus<br />
on national performance priorities and on standards for performance measurement and public reporting. The<br />
American Board of Medical Specialties and the American Board of Internal Medicine provide certification to<br />
physicians who meet specified standards of quality.<br />
What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care?<br />
In 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services released the National Quality Strategy, a component of<br />
the ACA that lays out national aims and priorities to guide local, state, and national quality improvement efforts,<br />
supported by an array of partnerships with public and private stakeholders. Current initiatives include efforts to<br />
reduce hospital-acquired infections and preventable readmissions (see below).<br />
CMS has moved toward increased public reporting of provider performance data in an effort to promote<br />
improvement. One such initiative is Hospital Compare, a service that reports on measures of care processes,<br />
care outcomes, and patient experience at more than 4,000 hospitals. In additional, with support from the ACA<br />
and such groups as the Open Government Partnership, CMS is making Medicare data available to “qualified<br />
entities,” such as health improvement organizations, which are beginning to release data on payments made<br />
by Medicare to individual physicians and amounts paid to physicians and hospitals by pharmaceutical and<br />
device companies. Release of such information is intended to both increase transparency and improve quality.<br />
States have developed additional public reporting systems and measures, including some that address<br />
ambulatory care. Consumer-led groups, such as Consumers Union and the Leapfrog Group, also report on<br />
quality and safety.<br />
Incentives to reduce avoidable hospital readmissions among Medicare patients were introduced in October<br />
2012, by way of financial penalties. Since the program’s initiation, 20-day readmission rates nationally have<br />
declined from 19 percent to less than 18 percent (Blumenthal et al., 2015). Incentives to reduce hospitalacquired<br />
conditions, by reducing Medicare payments to the lowest-performing hospitals by 1 percent, were also<br />
introduced. Recent data show the first-ever decline in rates of hospital-acquired conditions nationally<br />
(Blumenthal et al., 2015).<br />
Finally, Medicare, and the majority of private insurance providers, is implementing a variety of pay-for-value<br />
programs. Starting in 2013, 1 percent of Medicare payments are redistributed to the highest performers on a<br />
composite of cost and quality measures. The program was introduced to physicians in 2015 on a voluntary basis<br />
and is expected to become mandatory by 2017. As yet, results are too preliminary to draw conclusions<br />
(Blumenthal et al., 2015).<br />
176<br />
The Commonwealth Fund